On Mon, 13 May 2024 16:10:24 +0100 Raphael Taylor-Davies <r.taylordav...@googlemail.com.INVALID> wrote: > > I guess I wonder if rather than having a parquet format version 2, or > even a parquet format version 3, we could just document what features a > given parquet implementation actually supports. I believe Andrew intends > to pick up on where previous efforts here left off.
I also believe documenting implementation status is strongly desirable, regardless of whether the discussion on "V3" goes anywhere. Regards Antoine.
