+1 agree, much cleaner naming

-Dan

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 8:46 AM Chao Sun <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 too. The name has been confusing for a very long time.
>
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 8:40 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 - I think it is much clearer to anyone.
> >
> > GitHub will handle all the redirects from the old to the new name, so no
> > reason from my end to not rename it :)
> >
> > Cheers, Fokko
> >
> > Op vr 17 mei 2024 om 17:30 schreef Julien Le Dem <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > +1
> > > I should have named it that to start with.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 3:27 AM Wang, Yuming <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +10086
> > > >
> > > > From: Uwe L. Korn <[email protected]>
> > > > Date: Thursday, May 16, 2024 at 15:41
> > > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] rename parquet-mr to parquet-java?
> > > > External Email
> > > >
> > > > very heavy +1
> > > >
> > > > This would help a lot.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, May 16, 2024, at 4:19 AM, Gang Wu wrote:
> > > > > +1 on renaming the repo to reduce confusion.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, the java library still uses the "parquet-mr" prefix to
> write
> > > its
> > > > > application version [1] and it is consumed by downstream projects
> > like
> > > > > parquet-cpp [2] as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Drepo%253Aapache%252Fparquet-mr%2Bparquet-mr%2Blanguage%253AJava%26type%3Dcode%26l%3DJava&data=05%7C02%7Cyumwang%40ebay.com%7Cfed824d59ca84cb3004408dc757b882c%7C46326bff992841a0baca17c16c94ea99%7C0%7C0%7C638514420629473555%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=E4AZ8hEbQyCLy3aXAU2umohUlTCksqHVO5Imfc%2BM6p0%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fparquet-mr+parquet-mr+language%3AJava&type=code&l=Java
> > > > >
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Drepo%253Aapache%252Farrow%2Bparquet-mr%2Blanguage%253AC%252B%252B%2B%26type%3Dcode&data=05%7C02%7Cyumwang%40ebay.com%7Cfed824d59ca84cb3004408dc757b882c%7C46326bff992841a0baca17c16c94ea99%7C0%7C0%7C638514420629484103%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cuaTrenLP4WKex0Mbdk7DbbhzcEP45jhqwj5swRZ5Pk%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Farrow+parquet-mr+language%3AC%2B%2B+&type=code
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Gang
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:47 AM Vinoo Ganesh <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1, I think this will make things a lot clearer! (non-binding)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> <[email protected]>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:36 PM Jacques Nadeau <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > +1000
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:30 AM Andrew Lamb <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > >> > wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Julien had a great suggestion[1] to  rename the parquet-mr
> > > > repository
> > > > >> to
> > > > >> > > parquet-java to reduce confusion about its content.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >  > This looks great. Thank you for taking the initiative.
> Hadoop
> > > is
> > > > not
> > > > >> > > required indeed. Perhaps at some point we should rename
> > parquet-mr
> > > > to
> > > > >> > > parquet-java?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Having just renamed
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Farrow-datafusion&data=05%7C02%7Cyumwang%40ebay.com%7Cfed824d59ca84cb3004408dc757b882c%7C46326bff992841a0baca17c16c94ea99%7C0%7C0%7C638514420629491325%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ANZoBX%2B7w4Uu%2BCvBfiuUBLRXqAIF5KDSmtm%2BCtQmroc%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion> to
> > > > >> > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fdatafusion&data=05%7C02%7Cyumwang%40ebay.com%7Cfed824d59ca84cb3004408dc757b882c%7C46326bff992841a0baca17c16c94ea99%7C0%7C0%7C638514420629496155%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=CLaLQrZNT761zudqaoMkY2EeC%2F5MGdOeY5veMRe5WcI%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/datafusion> I think this would be a
> > > > >> relatively
> > > > >> > > painless experience as all existing links still work
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > I filed a ticket here
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fissues.apache.org%2Fjira%2Fbrowse%2FPARQUET-2475&data=05%7C02%7Cyumwang%40ebay.com%7Cfed824d59ca84cb3004408dc757b882c%7C46326bff992841a0baca17c16c94ea99%7C0%7C0%7C638514420629500280%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0E9HcvNlNqJoXCfCI7Nzl0Frphoqnlvu9gWb%2Fd5%2BOXM%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2475>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Thoughts?
> > > > >> > > Andrew
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [1]
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Fparquet-site%2Fpull%2F59%23pullrequestreview-2056038304&data=05%7C02%7Cyumwang%40ebay.com%7Cfed824d59ca84cb3004408dc757b882c%7C46326bff992841a0baca17c16c94ea99%7C0%7C0%7C638514420629504472%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fTAB%2FtTFPGyqrJR11uCGYfjGUcmMAJL8q7LykgK%2BzXM%3D&reserved=0
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/59#pullrequestreview-2056038304
> > > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to