very heavy +1 This would help a lot.
On Thu, May 16, 2024, at 4:19 AM, Gang Wu wrote: > +1 on renaming the repo to reduce confusion. > > However, the java library still uses the "parquet-mr" prefix to write its > application version [1] and it is consumed by downstream projects like > parquet-cpp [2] as well. > > [1] > https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fparquet-mr+parquet-mr+language%3AJava&type=code&l=Java > [2] > https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Farrow+parquet-mr+language%3AC%2B%2B+&type=code > > Best, > Gang > > On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:47 AM Vinoo Ganesh <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1, I think this will make things a lot clearer! (non-binding) >> >> <vinoo.gan...@gmail.com> >> >> >> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:36 PM Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > +1000 >> > >> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:30 AM Andrew Lamb <andrewlam...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Julien had a great suggestion[1] to rename the parquet-mr repository >> to >> > > parquet-java to reduce confusion about its content. >> > > >> > > > This looks great. Thank you for taking the initiative. Hadoop is not >> > > required indeed. Perhaps at some point we should rename parquet-mr to >> > > parquet-java? >> > > >> > > Having just renamed https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion to >> > > https://github.com/apache/datafusion I think this would be a >> relatively >> > > painless experience as all existing links still work >> > > >> > > I filed a ticket here >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PARQUET-2475 >> > > >> > > Thoughts? >> > > Andrew >> > > >> > > [1] >> > > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/59#pullrequestreview-2056038304 >> > > >> > >>