+1 this is great, it puts a lot of clarity in the process.
On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 4:26 AM Gang Wu <ust...@gmail.com> wrote: > Generally +1 on the proposal. Thanks for finalizing it! > > I have left a comment regarding the next major release of parquet-java. > > Best, > Gang > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 1:55 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > This vote is whether to adopt and merge [1][2] a proposal for providing > > formal guidance on new features are added to the Parquet format, > > recommendations on when incompatible features should be turned on in > > implementations by default and a proposed release cadence for > Parquet-java. > > > > This was first published for discussion on the dev mailing list on [3]. > > > > Given we are headed into a holiday weekend in the US the vote will remain > > open for until at least Wednesday, July 10th to ensure adequate time for > > people who might be taking time away from their computer. > > > > Thanks, > > Micah > > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the guidance in the PR proposals and merge them. > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the guidance because .... > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/258 > > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/61/files > > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/bcc13dtdvnxvg55nhyowbwzqomfljgvb > > >
