+1 for adding the variant spec to Parquet. I'm looking forward to working
on the addition of shredding.

As for the details, I think I also prefer a separate repository,
`parquet-variant`, but I don't think we necessarily need to determine that
question up front.

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 9:05 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Antoine,
>
> A separate project was my 1st proposal in the original discussion
> on the dev@iceberg ML :).
>
> TBH, I'm open to putting them either in existing repos or a dedicated
> parquet-variant repo. The intention of this thread is to try to push the
> discussion to reach a consensus.
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:54 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Gang,
> >
> > Assuming we do want to adopt this in Parquet, I would very much
> > recommend separate repositories for this. Putting the spec inside
> > `parquet-format` breeds confusion, IMHO, and may discourage third
> > parties from considering this standalone, non-Parquet, data format.
> >
> > (but for the same reason, I would recommand a separate project as well
> > :-))
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:48:03 +0800
> > Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I’d like to start a vote for adopting the Variant specification and
> > library
> > > from
> > > the Spark project. This allows the Variant binary format and shredding
> > > format
> > > to be more broadly used by other interested projects and systems.
> > >
> > > For repositories to host the Variant specification and library:
> > > - apache/parquet-format will add documentation for the specification
> > > - apache/parquet-java will add a new module for the Java implementation
> > >
> > > Please refer to the discussion thread:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/6h58hj39lhqtcyd2hlsyvqm4lzdh4b9z
> > >
> > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1: Accept the proposal
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1: I don’t think this is a good idea because …
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Gang
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to