What python implementation are we talking about here? On Wednesday, January 22, 2025, Andrew Lamb <[email protected]> wrote:
> I also unfortunately will not be able to make it today. > > As a brief update, I am working on finding someone to help with the Rust > implementation of variant. Moving forward with Java and Python seems > reasonable to me, though I would truly love to get a Rust implementation to > ensure there is no potential gotcha's for a native implementation > > Thanks, > Andrew > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 11:41 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey Julien, > > > > I'm not going to be able to attend today's meeting, but just wanted to > > follow up on a few of the items from the last meeting. > > > > With respect to the reference implementations for Variant, we had > > discussed the possibility of Rust or C++, but those both have significant > > work. The Java and native Python implementations are much closer and > > should cover the concerns for verification of the spec. I still think > > there will be work on the Rust side, but I don't think there's a C++ > > implementation that would be in a state to open source. > > > > For the shredding spec, Micah, Ryan, Russel and I met and are closing in > on > > wording that everyone is happy with, so I expect that will close out > > shortly. > > > > -Dan > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 7:41 AM Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The next Parquet sync is today Jan 22nd at 9:30am PT - 12:30pm ET - > > 6:30pm > > > CET > > > (in about 2hs) > > > To join the invite: > > > https://calendar.app.google/xXGgYU6evBArpzdZ9 > > > Please contact me to be added to the recurring invite. > > > Everybody is welcome, bring your topic or just listen in. > > > Best > > > Julien > > > > > >
