Thanks Gábor and Fokko!

I have backported https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3295 and will
start preparing RC2 if everything looks good.

On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 9:31 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey Gabor,
>
> Thanks for catching that, and I agree that it should be fixed. I've created
> a patch here <https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3292>.
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
> Op vr 29 aug 2025 om 13:12 schreef Gábor Szádovszky <[email protected]>:
>
> > Thanks, Gang for managing the release!
> >
> > During executing some external tests I've discovered a regression. See
> [1].
> > I'll check further whether other issues may surface, but as of now, I
> need
> > to give a -1 (binding) on this RC.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/issues/3291
> >
> > Gang Wu <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. aug. 29., P, 8:49):
> >
> > > Hi everyone,
> > >
> > > I propose the following RC to be released as the official Apache
> Parquet
> > > Java 1.16.0 release.
> > >
> > > The commit id is 36d18808e0d5206cadbb643dc82750027fb1aaf7
> > > * This corresponds to the tag: apache-parquet-1.16.0-rc1
> > > *
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/tree/36d18808e0d5206cadbb643dc82750027fb1aaf7
> > >
> > > The release tarball, signature, and checksums are here:
> > > *
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/parquet/apache-parquet-1.16.0-rc1
> > >
> > > You can find the KEYS file here:
> > > * https://downloads.apache.org/parquet/KEYS
> > >
> > > You can find the changelog here:
> > > *
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/releases/tag/apache-parquet-1.16.0-rc1
> > >
> > > Binary artifacts are staged in Nexus here:
> > > *
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/parquet/
> > >
> > > Please download, verify, and test.
> > >
> > > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Parquet Java 1.16.0
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release this because...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Gang
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to