Hi Parquet Dev, I put a draft PR together [1] to refactor the implementation status page [2] to use JSON as data layer and render it using hugo code.
My rationale for doing this: 1. I think in the long run it will make it easier to review and make small updates from engines (mostly be comparing new/updates rows of JSON for a single engine). Adding new data for a new engine would only have to touch a file specific to that engine after it is first registered. 2. I think it is a good idea to start collecting more metadata (in particular version number/release date) for implementations. I think displaying/tracking this might get tricky without a more structured approach. In particular I think having different pivots on features/dates would be useful. Developing locally, the current iteration of the change generates effectively the same visible content. I also tried to add hyperlinks from notes to the actual note (at least on my browser these seem a bit weird as they scroll just slightly past the note). Any objections to proceeding with this type of change? Thanks, Micah [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-site/pull/143 [2] https://parquet.apache.org/docs/file-format/implementationstatus/
