Bumping this again to call for PMC members to vote on https://lists.apache.org/thread/7kjqsz7n8cwqpgfo2h9c5q0csml77d86
Or do we need to abort this vote until we sort out approaches for defining a better Parquet version (preset)? On Tue, Jun 9, 2026 at 12:33 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > Vote thread is sent: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/7kjqsz7n8cwqpgfo2h9c5q0csml77d86 > > On Mon, Jun 8, 2026 at 10:28 PM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I also think it is reasonable to start a release. >> >> Thanks, >> Micah >> >> On Friday, June 5, 2026, Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Sounds good, Gang. No objections from my end. Thanks for running this! >> > >> > Kind regards, >> > Fokko >> > >> > On 2026/06/05 03:23:55 Gang Wu wrote: >> > > It seems that the work on making `ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema` >> > optional >> > > still needs more discussion as per [1], so I'm inclined not to wait >> for >> > it >> > > for the 2.13.0 release. >> > > >> > > Regarding Ismaël's comment [2], I don't think it changes any spec, so >> it >> > > should not block the release and reviewers need more time to read >> them. >> > > >> > > If there are no objections, I will create a Release Candidate (RC) >> next >> > > week. >> > > >> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/gm7btrgvprdbrh8c5nv061f402txo0vt >> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/572 >> > > >> > > Best, >> > > Gang >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2026 at 11:38 PM Ismaël Mejía <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > I just wanted to mention that, as part of my ongoing AI >> explorations, I >> > > > opened a PR fixing minor issues such as orthography, grammar, and >> some >> > > > snippet errors. >> > > > >> > > > It’s a small PR (~200 lines), so it should be quick to review and, >> > > > hopefully, make it into the next release. >> > > > https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/572 >> > > > >> > > > Best, >> > > > Ismaël >> > > > >> > > > On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 11:06 AM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected] >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > +1 for the release >> > > > > >> > > > > I got a small one to bump to the latest version of Thrift to >> supress >> > a >> > > > > CVE: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/570 >> > > > > >> > > > > I don't think we should block releases for format since they are >> > pretty >> > > > > ligthtweight and might unblock downstream consumers. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > Fokko >> > > > > >> > > > > On 2026/05/29 02:40:14 Micah Kornfield wrote: >> > > > > > I need to do another pass on the C++ implementation. I think I >> saw >> > > > some >> > > > > > other comments on the spec change, which I'm not sure if they >> are >> > > > > > addressed. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 7:07 PM Gang Wu <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > I agree that we need to wait for "Make >> > > > `ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema` >> > > > > > > optional". I think it has reached consensus and Ed will start >> a >> > vote >> > > > > > > shortly. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is the ALP change close enough to wait for that too? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I'm catching up with its progress. Perhaps active contributors >> > and >> > > > > > > reviewers can chime in? >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 10:00 AM Curt Hagenlocher < >> > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is the ALP change close enough to wait for that too? >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On May 28, 2026, at 3:10 PM, Micah Kornfield < >> > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > I think if possible landing "Make >> > > > `ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema` >> > > > > > > optional" >> > > > > > > > > would be good to avoid a second release soon after. >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 9:00 AM Gang Wu < >> [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Hi all, >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> I would like to start a discussion about a parquet-format >> > 2.13.0 >> > > > > > > release. >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> It has been about 9 months since 2.12.0 was released on >> > August >> > > > 28, >> > > > > > > 2025. >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Since then, we have had some meaningful updates, >> especially: >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> - [PR #514](https://github.com/ >> > apache/parquet-format/pull/514) >> > > > > > > > >> PARQUET-2249: Introduce IEEE 754 total order & NaN-counts >> > > > > > > > >> - [PR #565](https://github.com/ >> > apache/parquet-format/pull/565) >> > > > > > > GH-506: >> > > > > > > > >> Clarify field ordering for partially shredded object >> union >> > > > > > > > >> - [PR #560](https://github.com/ >> > apache/parquet-format/pull/560) >> > > > > Update >> > > > > > > > >> wording in Geospatial spec >> > > > > > > > >> - [PR #562](https://github.com/ >> > apache/parquet-format/pull/562) >> > > > > > > GH-561: >> > > > > > > > >> variant schema examples to use `(VARIANT(1))` >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> There are also some open PRs that may be worth waiting >> for, >> > > > > > > especially: >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> - [PR #564](https://github.com/ >> > apache/parquet-format/pull/564) >> > > > > > > GH-563: >> > > > > > > > >> Make `ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema` optional >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> It looks promising to me, and there is already related >> > > > > implementation >> > > > > > > > >> work in arrow-rs, parquet-java, and arrow-cpp. (Thanks >> Ed!) >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> What do people think? >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> Thanks, >> > > > > > > > >> Gang >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
