dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [DISCUSS] complete FILE proposal Daniel Weeks
• [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Gunnar Morling
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync July 1st Gunnar Morling
• [DISCUSS] Allow VARIANT value field to be omitted Zehua Zou
• Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Kevin Liu
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Micah Kornfield
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Kevin Liu
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Kevin Liu
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Steve Loughran
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Ed Seidl
  • Re: Expected behavior for older parquet-java readers with VARIANT columns Kevin Liu
• [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Kurtis Wright
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Gunnar Morling
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Variant Hardening: how deep is a realistic variant depth? Steve Loughran
• Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Gunnar Morling
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Steve Loughran
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Gunnar Morling
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Steve Loughran
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Pritam Pan
  • Re: Announcing the release of Hardwood 1.0, a new Parquet reader for the JVM Gunnar Morling
• [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Moving to SemVer for parquet-format releases Micah Kornfield
• [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Divjot Arora via dev
  • [RESULT][VOTE] GH-583: Define ordering for INT96 timestamps Micah Kornfield
• Parquet Footer Working Group - session 3 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 3 Manu Zhang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 3 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 3 Jiayi Wang
• AssertJ for Assertions in tests Eduard Tudenhöfner
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Steve Loughran
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Russell Spitzer
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Steve Loughran
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Eduard Tudenhöfner
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Gunnar Morling
  • Re: AssertJ for Assertions in tests Eduard Tudenhöfner via dev
• [DISCUSS] Clarifying NaN bit preservation in floating-point encodings Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying NaN bit preservation in floating-point encodings Gábor Szádovszky
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Clarifying NaN bit preservation in floating-point encodings Gang Wu
• Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Will Edwards via dev
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Andrew Pikler
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Clarification on row-group and column-chunk layout Ed Seidl
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 Gang Wu
• Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Jiayi Wang
  • Re: Parquet Footer Working Group - session 2 Jiayi Wang
• [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Neelesh Salian
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Ed Seidl
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet Format 2.13.0 RC0 Gang Wu
• Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Andrew Lamb
  • Re: Document which features are in which versions of Parquet Andrew Lamb
• [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync June 17th Julien Le Dem
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync June 17th Divjot Arora via dev
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync June 17th Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [need facilitator] Next Parquet sync June 17th Julien Le Dem
• sync today Wednesday Jun 3rd Julien Le Dem
  • Re: sync today Wednesday Jun 3rd Julien Le Dem
• [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Bell
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Antoine Pitrou
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Alkis Evlogimenos via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ryan Blue
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Ed Seidl
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Future of Parquet Versioning Andrew Lamb
• [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Ed Seidl
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Ed Seidl
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Daniel Weeks
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Andrew Lamb
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Gang Wu
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Ryan Blue
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Ed Seidl
  • Re: [VOTE] GH-563: Make ColumnMetaData.path_in_schema optional Ryan Blue
• [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Curt Hagenlocher
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Ismaël Mejía
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Micah Kornfield
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Release parquet-format 2.13.0? Gang Wu
• [DISCUSS] Bump minimum Java version to 17 for Parquet Java Ismaël Mejía
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum Java version to 17 for Parquet Java Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum Java version to 17 for Parquet Java Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum Java version to 17 for Parquet Java Aaron Niskode-Dossett via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Bump minimum Java version to 17 for Parquet Java Ismaël Mejía
• [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Aaron Niskode-Dossett via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Aaron Niskode-Dossett via dev
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Fokko Driesprong
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Gang Wu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Kevin Liu
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Ismaël Mejía
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Steve Loughran
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Russell Spitzer
  • Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Fokko Driesprong
  • RE: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Parquet 1.18.0 Peter Toth

• Earlier messages
• Later messages