+1 (non-binding)

Thank you for all the work that went into getting this to a good place.
This is a great next step for the community.

On Fri, Jul 31, 2026 at 14:07 Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Following questions on the the previous vote
> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/o8bwmqdy1wf0z459h65x43lnsrldrvhq> thread,
> here is a new vote essentially proposing the same thing but clarifying the
> specific points raised then. This is the result of our discussions over the
> last two weeks. With the direction set, we'll work on the linked design to
> finalize the implementation details. We decided to start a fresh vote to
> remove ambiguity of clarifying while voting is happening. See below.
>
> Julien
>
> This vote is to formalize our intent to use major version numbers to bundle
> groups of new features in Parquet. This is especially important to enable
> the safe roll-out of forward incompatible features (examples: new
> encodings). We will separately iron out the implementation details in
> the Parquet
> Versioning doc
> <
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/19bOTy1WcLs9NP88DrysG4wG50pM6gmIFaSEWzkxUeJw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.qlhnuhge8ke2
> >
> based on the principles below.
>
> Goals:
>
>    -
>
>    Have a clear definition of what is forward compatible or not.
>    -
>
>    Have a clear definition of what supporting a specific Parquet version
>    means (for write and for read).
>    -
>
>    Have clear version numbers for the ecosystem to coordinate on what’s
>    coming in the next version. Pragmatism will prevail by making them not
> too
>    frequent but not too far apart.
>    -
>
>    Ensure new features become mainstream in a reasonable amount of time.
>
>
> Specifically,
>
>    -
>
>    We will accumulate forward-incompatible changes targeted at the next
>    major version of the Parquet spec (for example Version 3). These
> are called “In
>    preview”
>    -
>
>    The same bar applies as before (two implementations, cross-testing, …
>    <
> https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#additionschanges-to-the-format
> >)
>    to add these features in preview in the spec.
>    -
>
>    While in preview they can be used for writing with a feature flag, in
>    particular to allow integration testing. All implementations are
> encouraged
>    to start being able to read it ASAP (at least two distinct OSS
>    implementations are already required to reach this stage).
>    -
>
>    These new changes will automatically go into the next major version.
>    (pragmatism applies for exceptions)
>    -
>
>    We will have a community vote to close and adopt the next major version.
>    -
>
>    At this point these features are no longer in preview. Systems
>    supporting the new version of Parquet (example: Parquet V3) can start
> using
>    it for writing new files by default. (Or communicate what they support
>    reading and what they write into files).
>    -
>
>    In an environment that requires compatibility with at least one system
>    that doesn’t support the latest version of Parquet yet, one can pin to a
>    specific version by passing a dedicated option to the writer. (example,
>    support reading Parquet V3 but opt to only write Parquet V2 until the
>    environment has upgraded).
>
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>
> [ ] +1: Adopt versions for forward-incompatible changes
>
> [ ] +0: Not going to block, but prefer . . .
>
> [ ] -1: Do not adopt versions for forward-incompatible changes because . .
> .
>

Reply via email to