+1 (binding)

On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 10:21 AM Zehua Zou <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> > On Aug 27, 2026, at 06:23, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 2:00 PM Ed Seidl <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> On 2026/08/26 20:12:17 Ryan Blue wrote:
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 11:01 AM PRATEEK GAUR <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (non-binding). Thanks for pushing for this Alkis.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 10:57 AM Daniel Weeks <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 12:51 PM Burak Yavuz <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 12:17 PM Micah Kornfield <
> >>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 binding.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 12:10 PM Antoine Pitrou <
> >> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Le 24/08/2026 à 16:02, Alkis Evlogimenos via dev a écrit :
> >>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I would like to start a vote on adopting the format change
> >> in PR
> >>>>> 603
> >>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>> remove self-references from the FILE logical type. This came
> >> out
> >>>> of
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> discussion on inheriting the inline codec [2].
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> FILE as merged lets a value set offset and size with no uri,
> >>>> which
> >>>>>>>>> addresses a byte range inside the containing file. This byte
> >>>> range
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> effectively owned by the Parquet writer. Specifying that
> >> range
> >>>>>> properly
> >>>>>>>>> means giving it a compression block, an encryption module,
> >> an AAD
> >>>>>>>> identity,
> >>>>>>>>> and its own size accounting. That is a second page mechanism
> >>>>>> reachable
> >>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>> through FILE. The use case is mid sized values and it is
> >> better
> >>>>>> served
> >>>>>>> by
> >>>>>>>>> non-contiguous pages, which we will propose separately.
> >> Removing
> >>>>>>>>> self-references keeps FILE to the forms it specifies cleanly,
> >>>> while
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> format has not shipped in a release.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The changes:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 1. Remove self-references. A value that sets offset and size
> >> with
> >>>>> no
> >>>>>>> uri
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> invalid. offset may only be set together with uri.
> >>>>>>>>> 2. Resolve uri uniformly as an external reference, including
> >> when
> >>>>> it
> >>>>>>>> names
> >>>>>>>>> the file that contains it. Parquet applies no compression or
> >>>>>> encryption
> >>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> its own to those bytes. The parquet writer does NOT own these
> >>>>> bytes.
> >>>>>> An
> >>>>>>>>> earlier draft forbade referencing the current file, but
> >> neither a
> >>>>>>> writer
> >>>>>>>>> nor a reader can check that, so the encoding is uniform
> >> instead.
> >>>>>>>>> 3. Drop the prohibition on modular encryption. It existed
> >> only
> >>>>>> because
> >>>>>>>>> self-referenced ranges were not encryption modules. The
> >> fields
> >>>> of a
> >>>>>>> FILE
> >>>>>>>>> group are ordinary columns and are encoded, compressed, and
> >>>>> encrypted
> >>>>>>>> like
> >>>>>>>>> any other column, inline included.
> >>>>>>>>> 4. Allow inline together with the locator fields. Both must
> >>>> denote
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> same
> >>>>>>>>> bytes, so a reader may resolve from either and get the same
> >>>> result,
> >>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>> inline is the cheaper path because it needs no external
> >> access.
> >>>> If
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> two
> >>>>>>>>> disagree the value is invalid, and a reader is not required
> >> to
> >>>>> detect
> >>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>> This combination was underspecified before.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The spec changes are in
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/603
> >>>>>>>>> and touch LogicalTypes.md and a comment in parquet.thrift.
> >>>>>>> Encryption.md
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> unchanged from master and no Thrift structures change.
> >> Inline and
> >>>>>>>> external
> >>>>>>>>> references behave as before for existing readers and writers.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the proposed format change
> >>>>>>>>> [ ] +0 No opinion
> >>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide specific reasons)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/603
> >>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/zrzc7t9fccg92rx3h4fw3ndw3bdo5xr7
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to