+1 (binding)

On Thu, Sep 3, 2026 at 4:53 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]>
wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for formalizing this.
>
> Kind regards,
> Fokko
>
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> On Wednesday, September 2nd, 2026 at 21:17, Matt Topol <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 12:22 PM Russell Spitzer
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 11:04 AM Micah Kornfield <[email protected]
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (binding).
> > > >
> > > > Gang had a minor wording update which I think captures the intent of
> the
> > > > proposal.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2026 at 7:25 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > This is short and useful, thank you Divjot.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Antoine.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Le 31/08/2026 à 19:26, Divjot Arora via dev a écrit :
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start a vote to adopt parquet-format PR 606 [1].
> This
> > > > PR
> > > > > > specifies graceful handling
> > > > > > for unrecognized logical/physical type combinations: in such
> cases, the
> > > > > > reader should drop the logical
> > > > > > type annotation and associated stats for the column (i.e. only
> parse
> > > > > based
> > > > > > on the physical type). There
> > > > > > are associated Java [2] and C++ [3] reference implementations,
> as well
> > > > > as a
> > > > > > parquet-testing PR [4]
> > > > > > to add a such a file.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote in the next 72 hours.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the proposed format change
> > > > > > [ ] +0 No opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not approve (please provide specific reasons)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > Div
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/606
> > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3711
> > > > > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/50909
> > > > > > [4] https://github.com/apache/parquet-testing/pull/122
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to