[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13871851#comment-13871851
]
Robert Meyer commented on PDFBOX-1645:
--------------------------------------
Hi John,
Thanks for taking the time to look at this and respond. I knew when I put this
patch forward that it was computationally expensive but could not see any other
way of retrieving accurate bounding box information for the characters. At the
time I was having issues with character layout in documents generated by FOP
and this naturally led me to believe that it was an issue with the co-ordinates
I was getting from the renderer. From further investigation though I now
understand that this information is only used in SVG documents and as such I am
no longer convinced that this information is vital or necessary for the OTF
implementation in the project. As such I will investigate further and submit a
patch should the need arise once I have a better understanding of what is
required.
> [PATCH] Improved the accuracy of the bounding box for each rendered CFF glyph
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PDFBOX-1645
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1645
> Project: PDFBox
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: FontBox
> Affects Versions: 1.8.2
> Reporter: Robert Meyer
> Assignee: Andreas Lehmkühler
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: characterl.png, charactert.png, patch-20131202.diff,
> patch.diff
>
>
> In a previous patch to the CharStringRenderer class, I resolved the rendering
> issues and added a method to retrieve the bounding box for a CFF glyph. This
> utilized the GeneralPath.getBounds() method to retrieve it's bounding box.
> Unfortunately it was found that the method uses the control points of the
> bezier curves instead of the actual lines and was not very accurate. I have
> therefore added several new methods to calculate the correct extents of the
> glyph so that now it matches that of the measurements found in tools like
> FontForge.
> As a side note, there are several checks which were originally added in my
> patch which were unfortunately removed relating to the number of arguments
> provided with an operator. I have one Adobe Font (Adobe Heiti Standard -
> CID-Keyed OTF) which has one or more glyphs which trip up on this and cause
> an Array index out of Bounds exception. Each glyph renders correctly even
> though this issue occurs and therefore would be grateful if these could be
> left in. I have re-added these checks back with the patch I am about to add.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)