Hi, Up to now, I guess xmpbox is not used widely. Do we have any feedback on its usage (out of PDF/A validation) ?
By the way: +1 to remove jempbox for 2.0.0 Guillaume Bailleul On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Timo Boehme <timo.boe...@ontochem.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Am 20.06.2014 08:05, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> we currently have two libraries handling XMP metadata jempbox and xmpbox. >> >> Part of PDFBOX-1187/PDFBOX-2197 was to remove a direct dependency from >> jempbox as now XMP metadata could be generated by any library and added as a >> stream. This will be available for PDFBox 2.0.0. >> >> I would like to propose to now retire jempbox as xmpbox >> >> # is closer to the spec (naming conventions) >> # used for PDF/A validation where we can not remove a dependency on XMP >> handling as checking metadata is necessary for PDF/A compliance. >> >> In case there is functionality in jempbox that is missing in xmpbox that >> could be added at a later stage upon request. >> >> WDYT? > > > +1 > > Best, > Timo > > > -- > > Timo Boehme > OntoChem GmbH > H.-Damerow-Str. 4 > 06120 Halle/Saale > T: +49 345 4780474 > F: +49 345 4780471 > timo.boe...@ontochem.com > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > OntoChem GmbH > Geschäftsführer: Dr. Lutz Weber > Sitz: Halle / Saale > Registergericht: Stendal > Registernummer: HRB 215461 > _____________________________________________________________________ >
