> Tilman Hausherr <thaush...@t-online.de> hat am 6. November 2015 um 09:36
> geschrieben:
> 
> 
> Am 06.11.2015 um 08:21 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
> >> Am 06.11.2015 um 07:30 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <andr...@lehmi.de>:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 02.11.2015 um 12:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> do we need another release candidate before releasing the final version?
> >>>
> >>> I would have some cycles to cut a RC2 this week only (on Wednesday?).
> >>>
> >>> WDYT?
> >> I'm going to cut the RC today in the evening (CET) aprox. 10-12 hours from
> >> now
> >>
> >> BUT I wont' do it if the build error still persists.
> > +1
> >
> 
> Yes :-(
> 
> Alternatives:
> - revert the problem commits
I'm reluctant to revert commits of someone else without feedback of the origin
author.

> - shorten the voting time so that you can still to the 2nd step before 
> you're unavailable (is this 72 hours thing an apache "must"?)
There has to be enough time so that everybody who is willing/wants to help is
able to do so. We have to take into account, that not all devs may be in the
same timezone.

72 hours is a widely accepted value to ensure that nobody is ignored because of
a too short period of time for voting.

BR
Andreas

> Tilman
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org

Reply via email to