Great! Thank you, Tilman!
I updated the wiki based on your feedback. Let me know if I should add
anything else while the experience is fresh.
Best,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Tilman Hausherr [mailto:thaush...@t-online.de]
Sent: Monday, November 6, 2017 3:00 PM
To: dev@pdfbox.apache.org
Subject: Re: Running tika-eval on the Rackspace vm
I think I was successful, the report now makes sense, as if Tim had created it
himself :-) The two issues I just created are related to a comparison between
2.0.8 and 2.0.4.
So for that next board report, we can now (additional to the existing
text) tell that there is now a second committer who can run the tests.
Tilman
Am 05.11.2017 um 22:06 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
> I've come closer to find out what's happening. I found out that
> tika-app was running with PDFBox 2.0.7 all the time regardless of what
> pdfbox version is in the pom.xml.
>
> Apparently, building tika-app uses tika-parsers from the repository
> (instead building tika-parsers it again), which needs 2.0.7.
> Explicitely building tika-parsers before building tika-app helps.
>
> This is new to me, in PDFBox if one builds the app all dependencies
> are built as well.
>
> Tilman
>
> Am 04.11.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
>> So it's done:
>> /work/eval/pdfbox_2_0_4_Vs_2_0_8-SNAPSHOT_reports_03112017
>>
>> I wonder why the differences are so few, especially in meta where I
>> KNOW that there are differences, due to the handling of empty strings
>> with BOM. Maybe it is because I skipped the "A" phase and used
>> existing data from a 2.0.4 run that I found, or because I use a
>> current tika trunk and not the existing binary that was on the server.
>>
>> I'm thinking of creating a new "A" with 2.0.4 with current tika trunk
>> and then compare with the "B" I did.
>>
>> Tilman
>>
>>
>> Am 03.11.2017 um 22:14 schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
>>> Am 03.11.2017 um 21:38 schrieb Allison, Timothy B.:
>>>> I'm not sure what you mean by...sorry
>>>>> - "H" is missing, which is identical to "C"
>>>
>>>
>>> I just meant the steps in https://wiki.apache.org/tika/TikaEvalOnVM
>>>
>>> In segment 3, "execute: nohup ./appBatchExecutor.sh &" is missing.
>>> Of course it is obvious that it has to be done, but I am a
>>> perfectionist. I'd like to have this documentation for the "me" in a
>>> few months when I have forgotten what I did the last days. Or for
>>> the next person.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the fixes you did. I wonder why writing to /tmp didn't
>>> work - it did work from the command line. I've started the command
>>> again, I'm not sure when I will report about it. I'm a bit exhausted
>>> from non-software activities :-(
>>>
>>> Tilman
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org For additional
commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pdfbox.apache.org
