On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 12:41:22PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> 
> >>So probably a similar suite but explicitly for mod_perl would be nice.
> >>
> > 
> > Oh, not at all. I am running smoke tests on my own computer, and I just
> > figured that I could hack up the p5p smoke test script and adapt it
> > to inculde mod_perl  build & tests.
> > 
> > But since there are only a handfull of people working on mod_perl right now,
> > would it really be THAT usefull?  If so, I'll try to hack it up soon, otherwise
> > back to todo/api.txt ;-)
> 
> If it's not much of an effort I think this would be very timely, since 
> 5.8 is knocking on the door. But I understand that the smoke test is a 
> hack (per your own words) and changing all the time, so how hard would 
> it be to keep up with the changes.

Actually, it's a lot better now, and I think I could sort it out quite
easily in my spare time on the plane between Singapore & KL ;-p

I'll check it out and if I realize it's _way_ to much work, I'll just
stop.  How's that ?

> _____________________________________________________________________
> Stas Bekman             JAm_pH      --   Just Another mod_perl Hacker
> http://stason.org/      mod_perl Guide   http://perl.apache.org/guide
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://ticketmaster.com http://apacheweek.com
> http://singlesheaven.com http://perl.apache.org http://perlmonth.com/
> 

-- 
Philippe M. Chiasson  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Extropia's Resident System Guru
     http://www.eXtropia.com/

/* When we have more time, we can teach the penguin to say 
  * "By your command" or "Activating turbo boost, Michael".
  */ 
        -- Linux        2.2.16
        /usr/src/linux/arch/sparc/prom/sun4prom.c

perl -e '$$=\${gozer};{$_=unpack(P26,pack(L,$$));/^Just Another Perl 
Hacker!\n$/&&print||$$++&&redo}'

Attachment: msg01827/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to