perhaps there's a more intuitive name?
bah - I _knew_ that would be a problem for somebody...
And it's usually Win32 :)
:)
I'd suggest renaming them all to MP_ or MP_HOOK_.
How about the following?
looks good. however, after thinking about it, I'm more inclined to use MP_HOOK instead - MP_VOID feels like it could have multiple meanings depending on context, whereas MP_HOOK_VOID feels a bit more descriptive.
maybe let stas or another committer weigh in first. other than that, looks good to me. sorry I didn't follow my instincts the first time :)
--Geoff
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
