- modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, 0.9.0); + modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, 2.0.40, 0.9.0); return APR_ENOTIMPL; }
+ modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(apr_socket_timeout_get, 2.0.40, 0.9.0);
yeah, I thought about that. the reason I kept it the way it was is because timeout_get/compress is what the perl interface is calling, which makes it more user friendly.
either way is fine with me, though.
Ah, of course, now I remember why I did that, thanks ;). Should we pass two arguments? the perl function and the C function?
modperl_apr_func_not_implemented(timeout_get, apr_socket_timeout_get, 2.0.40, 0.9.0);
__________________________________________________________________ Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
