[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1954?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14538624#comment-14538624
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on PHOENIX-1954:
--------------------------------------

I've not seen it in any other DB, but the requirement makes sense.

What happens if you use {{NEXT VALUE FOR seq}} more than one place in the same 
SQL statement? Should all occurrences have the same {{ALLOCATE}} clause?

Consider alternative syntax

{code}NEXT <n> VALUES FOR <seq>{code}

where

{code}NEXT 1 VALUES FOR <seq>{code}

is equivalent to

{code}NEXT VALUE FOR <seq>{code}

> Reserve chunks of numbers for a sequence
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-1954
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-1954
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lars Hofhansl
>
> In order to be able to generate many ids in bulk (for example in map reduce 
> jobs) we need a way to generate or reserve large sets of ids. We also need to 
> mix ids reserved with incrementally generated ids from other clients. 
> For this we need to atomically increment the sequence and return the value it 
> had when the increment happened.
> If we're OK to throw the current cached set of values away we can do
> {{NEXT VALUE FOR <seq>(,<N>)}}, that needs to increment value and return the 
> value it incremented from (i.e. it has to throw the current cache away, and 
> return the next value it found at the server).
> Or we can invent a new syntax {{RESERVE VALUES FOR <seq>, <N>}} that does the 
> same, but does not invalidate the cache.
> Note that in either case we won't retrieve the reserved set of values via 
> {{NEXT VALUE FOR}} because we'd need to be idempotent in our case, all we 
> need to guarantee is that after a call to {{RESERVE VALUES FOR <seq>, <N>}}, 
> which returns a value <M> is that the range [M, M+N) won't be used by any 
> other user of the sequence. My might need reserve 1bn ids this way ahead of a 
> map reduce run.
> Any better ideas?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to