Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/156#discussion_r58638661
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/iterate/TableResultIterator.java
---
@@ -107,8 +127,37 @@ public synchronized void close() throws SQLException {
@Override
public synchronized Tuple next() throws SQLException {
initScanner();
- Tuple t = scanIterator.next();
- return t;
+ try {
+ lastTuple = scanIterator.next();
+ if (lastTuple != null) {
+ ImmutableBytesWritable ptr = new ImmutableBytesWritable();
+ lastTuple.getKey(ptr);
+ }
+ } catch (SQLException e) {
+ try {
+ throw ServerUtil.parseServerException(e);
+ } catch(StaleRegionBoundaryCacheException e1) {
+ if(scan.getAttribute(NON_AGGREGATE_QUERY)!=null) {
+ Scan newScan = ScanUtil.newScan(scan);
+ if(lastTuple != null) {
+ lastTuple.getKey(ptr);
+ byte[] startRowSuffix =
ByteUtil.copyKeyBytesIfNecessary(ptr);
+ if(ScanUtil.isLocalIndex(newScan)) {
+ newScan.setAttribute(SCAN_START_ROW_SUFFIX,
ByteUtil.nextKey(startRowSuffix));
+ } else {
+
newScan.setStartRow(ByteUtil.nextKey(startRowSuffix));
+ }
+ }
+
plan.getContext().getConnection().getQueryServices().clearTableRegionCache(htable.getTableName());
+ this.scanIterator =
+
plan.iterator(DefaultParallelScanGrouper.getInstance(), newScan);
--- End diff --
Ah, I misread that. The case of an ordered aggregate falls into the same
category, however, as we're aggregating in-place. I don't think we need any
additional code in the unordered aggregate code path in
GroupedAggregateRegionObserver (other than the duplicate in-region check I
mentioned above).
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at [email protected] or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
