Ok, thanks, Josh. We can hold off until Mon for the RC so we can get the latest and greatest Avatica.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> wrote: > Looks like Alan just voted, so it will pass once the 72hrs is up. > > I can make sure that change gets into Phoenix over the weekend. > > > James Taylor wrote: > >> If we can cut a Phoenix RC on Monday morning, it's likely still ok. Do you >> think the Avatica vote will close by Sun night (and yes, I'll vote :-) )? >> >> Thanks, >> James >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Josh Elser<els...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> I wouldn't -1 4.9.0 over it since it's my own lack of time to have gotten >>> out an Avatica release prior to this, but my feelings are best summarized >>> by a -0. There aren't any show-stoppers, but 1.9.0 is a good >>> "stabilizing" >>> release upstream (I'm hoping that it will help drive more client-side >>> work >>> with PQS). >>> >>> If we're going to be sticking firmly to the schedule going forward (which >>> is great, IMO), more than two days notice to the rc0 date would be >>> appreciated :) >>> >>> >>> James Taylor wrote: >>> >>> We'd like to stick to our schedule for a Phoenix 4.9.0 RC on Fri (10/28). >>>> If there are no showstopper fixes in Avatica 1.9.0, are you ok with >>>> getting >>>> that in the next Phoenix release planned for one month from now, Josh? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> James >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Josh Elser<josh.el...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'd like to get updated to Avatica 1.9.0 for Phoenix 4.9.0 (let's us do >>>> >>>>> PHOENIX-3004), but its vote is scheduled to close tmrw. That _should_ >>>>> give >>>>> me time to push in the update and do some basic testing before Friday. >>>>> >>>>> Might I be able to sway you into casting a vote over there to make sure >>>>> that the train of releases doesn't get held up, James? (Beers on me >>>>> next >>>>> time) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> James Taylor wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We've got a lot of great stuff (mostly bug fixes) already checked in >>>>> for >>>>> >>>>>> 4.9.0. Please let me know if you have any outstanding JIRAs you'd like >>>>>> to >>>>>> see in the release. Here's a few that are under review and are >>>>>> expected >>>>>> to >>>>>> make it in: >>>>>> PHOENIX-6 Support ON DUPLICATE KEY construct >>>>>> PHOENIX-476 Support declaration of DEFAULT in CREATE statement >>>>>> >>>>>> These will hopefully have a patch today and make it in too: >>>>>> PHOENIX-3326 Restoring SYSTEM.CATALOG from snapshot causes clients to >>>>>> run >>>>>> into UpgradeInProgressException >>>>>> PHOENIX-3407 Wrong type of RowLock acquired by MetaDataEndPointImpl >>>>>> for >>>>>> HBase 1.2 >>>>>> PHOENIX-3396 Valid Multi-byte strings whose total byte size is greater >>>>>> than >>>>>> the max char limit cannot be inserted into VARCHAR fields in the PK >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> James >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>
