[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Joel Palmert updated PHOENIX-3451:
----------------------------------
    Description: 
This may be related to PHOENIX-3452 but the behavior is different so filing it 
separately.
Steps to repro:

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TEST.TEST (
    ORGANIZATION_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
    CONTAINER_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
    ENTITY_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
    SCORE DOUBLE,
    CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (
        ORGANIZATION_ID,
        CONTAINER_ID,
        ENTITY_ID
    )
) VERSIONS=1, MULTI_TENANT=TRUE, REPLICATION_SCOPE=1, TTL=31536000;
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS TEST_SCORE ON TEST.TEST (CONTAINER_ID, SCORE DESC, 
ENTITY_ID DESC);

UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container2','entityId6',1.1);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container1','entityId5',1.2);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container2','entityId4',1.3);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container1','entityId3',1.4);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container3','entityId7',1.35);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container3','entityId8',1.45);

EXPLAIN
SELECT DISTINCT entity_id, score
FROM test.test
WHERE organization_id = 'org2'
AND container_id IN ( 'container1','container2','container3' )
ORDER BY score DESC
LIMIT 2

OUTPUT
entityId5    1.2
entityId3    1.4

The expected out out would be
entityId8    1.45
entityId3    1.4

You will get the expected output if you remove the secondary index from the 
table or remove distinct from the query.

As described in PHOENIX-3452 if you run the query without the LIMIT the 
ordering is not correct. However, the 2first results in that ordering is still 
not the onces returned by the limit clause, which makes me think there are 
multiple issues here and why I filed both separately. The rows being returned 
are the ones assigned to container1. It looks like Phoenix is first getting the 
rows from the first container and when it finds that to be enough it stops the 
scan. What it should be doing is getting 2 results for each container and then 
merge then and then limit again.

  was:
Steps to repro:

CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TEST.TEST (
    ORGANIZATION_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
    CONTAINER_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
    ENTITY_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
    SCORE DOUBLE,
    CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (
        ORGANIZATION_ID,
        CONTAINER_ID,
        ENTITY_ID
    )
) VERSIONS=1, MULTI_TENANT=TRUE, REPLICATION_SCOPE=1, TTL=31536000;
CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS TEST_SCORE ON TEST.TEST (CONTAINER_ID, SCORE DESC, 
ENTITY_ID DESC);

UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container2','entityId6',1.1);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container1','entityId5',1.2);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container2','entityId4',1.3);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container1','entityId3',1.4);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container3','entityId7',1.35);
UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container3','entityId8',1.45);

EXPLAIN
SELECT DISTINCT entity_id, score
FROM test.test
WHERE organization_id = 'org2'
AND container_id IN ( 'container1','container2','container3' )
ORDER BY score DESC
LIMIT 2

OUTPUT
entityId5    1.2
entityId3    1.4

The expected out out would be
entityId8    1.45
entityId3    1.4

You will get the expected output if you remove the secondary index from the 
table or remove distinct from the query.

Further notice that the outputed 2 rows is not the first two rows if you run 
the query without the limit.

The rows being returned are the ones assigned to container1. It looks like 
Phoenix is first getting the rows from the first container and when it finds 
that to be enough it stops the scan. What it should be doing is getting 2 
results for each container and then merge then and then limit again.


> Secondary index and query using distinct: LIMIT doesn't return the first rows
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-3451
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3451
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 4.8.0
>            Reporter: Joel Palmert
>
> This may be related to PHOENIX-3452 but the behavior is different so filing 
> it separately.
> Steps to repro:
> CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TEST.TEST (
>     ORGANIZATION_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
>     CONTAINER_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
>     ENTITY_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
>     SCORE DOUBLE,
>     CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (
>         ORGANIZATION_ID,
>         CONTAINER_ID,
>         ENTITY_ID
>     )
> ) VERSIONS=1, MULTI_TENANT=TRUE, REPLICATION_SCOPE=1, TTL=31536000;
> CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS TEST_SCORE ON TEST.TEST (CONTAINER_ID, SCORE DESC, 
> ENTITY_ID DESC);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container2','entityId6',1.1);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container1','entityId5',1.2);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container2','entityId4',1.3);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container1','entityId3',1.4);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container3','entityId7',1.35);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container3','entityId8',1.45);
> EXPLAIN
> SELECT DISTINCT entity_id, score
> FROM test.test
> WHERE organization_id = 'org2'
> AND container_id IN ( 'container1','container2','container3' )
> ORDER BY score DESC
> LIMIT 2
> OUTPUT
> entityId5    1.2
> entityId3    1.4
> The expected out out would be
> entityId8    1.45
> entityId3    1.4
> You will get the expected output if you remove the secondary index from the 
> table or remove distinct from the query.
> As described in PHOENIX-3452 if you run the query without the LIMIT the 
> ordering is not correct. However, the 2first results in that ordering is 
> still not the onces returned by the limit clause, which makes me think there 
> are multiple issues here and why I filed both separately. The rows being 
> returned are the ones assigned to container1. It looks like Phoenix is first 
> getting the rows from the first container and when it finds that to be enough 
> it stops the scan. What it should be doing is getting 2 results for each 
> container and then merge then and then limit again.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to