[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-3451:
----------------------------------
Attachment: PHOENIX-3451_v1.patch
Here's a patch which needs more test cases, [~comnetwork]. It's on top of your
other patches for the other JIRAs. See my code comments for explanations. When
determining if the ORDER BY preserves order when there's a GROUP BY, we only
need to consider the GROUP BY expressions as that's what determines the order
of the rows coming back. The one case that's a bit tricky (and that needs some
more tests) is determining if the ORDER BY only contains some of the GROUP BY
expressions. If the other GROUP BY expressions only refer to columns that are
held constant (due to equality constraints in the WHERE clause), the ORDER BY
may still be optimized out. See my new test case in QueryCompilerTest as an
example, but it'd be good to add more tests.
> Secondary index and query using distinct: LIMIT doesn't return the first rows
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3451
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3451
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.8.0
> Reporter: Joel Palmert
> Assignee: chenglei
> Attachments: PHOENIX-3451_v1.patch
>
>
> This may be related to PHOENIX-3452 but the behavior is different so filing
> it separately.
> Steps to repro:
> CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS TEST.TEST (
> ORGANIZATION_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
> CONTAINER_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
> ENTITY_ID CHAR(15) NOT NULL,
> SCORE DOUBLE,
> CONSTRAINT TEST_PK PRIMARY KEY (
> ORGANIZATION_ID,
> CONTAINER_ID,
> ENTITY_ID
> )
> ) VERSIONS=1, MULTI_TENANT=TRUE, REPLICATION_SCOPE=1, TTL=31536000;
> CREATE INDEX IF NOT EXISTS TEST_SCORE ON TEST.TEST (CONTAINER_ID, SCORE DESC,
> ENTITY_ID DESC);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container2','entityId6',1.1);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container1','entityId5',1.2);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container2','entityId4',1.3);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container1','entityId3',1.4);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container3','entityId7',1.35);
> UPSERT INTO test.test VALUES ('org2','container3','entityId8',1.45);
> EXPLAIN
> SELECT DISTINCT entity_id, score
> FROM test.test
> WHERE organization_id = 'org2'
> AND container_id IN ( 'container1','container2','container3' )
> ORDER BY score DESC
> LIMIT 2
> OUTPUT
> entityId5 1.2
> entityId3 1.4
> The expected out out would be
> entityId8 1.45
> entityId3 1.4
> You will get the expected output if you remove the secondary index from the
> table or remove distinct from the query.
> As described in PHOENIX-3452 if you run the query without the LIMIT the
> ordering is not correct. However, the 2first results in that ordering is
> still not the onces returned by the limit clause, which makes me think there
> are multiple issues here and why I filed both separately. The rows being
> returned are the ones assigned to container1. It looks like Phoenix is first
> getting the rows from the first container and when it finds that to be enough
> it stops the scan. What it should be doing is getting 2 results for each
> container and then merge then and then limit again.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
