[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4029?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Taylor updated PHOENIX-4029:
----------------------------------
Description: Transactional tables have a different coprocessor for doing
index maintenance, PhoenixTransactionalIndexer. We should move the RS-RS index
writes for the PhoenixTransactionalIndexer to postBatchMutateIndispensably the
same way we did for non transactional tables in PHOENIX-3789. This is somewhat
trickier for transactional tables because we don't put the index edits in the
WAL so we don't have an easy way of getting them back in the
postBatchMutateIndispensably call. (was: Transactional tables have a different
coprocessor for doing index maintenance, PhoenixTransactionalIndexer. We should
move the RS-RS index writes for the PhoenixTransactionalIndexer to
postBatchMutateIndispensably the same way we did for non transactional tables
in PHOENIX-3789.)
> Move RS-RS index writes for transactional tables to
> postBatchMutateIndispensably
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-4029
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4029
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Fix For: 4.12.0
>
>
> Transactional tables have a different coprocessor for doing index
> maintenance, PhoenixTransactionalIndexer. We should move the RS-RS index
> writes for the PhoenixTransactionalIndexer to postBatchMutateIndispensably
> the same way we did for non transactional tables in PHOENIX-3789. This is
> somewhat trickier for transactional tables because we don't put the index
> edits in the WAL so we don't have an easy way of getting them back in the
> postBatchMutateIndispensably call.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
