[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16497643#comment-16497643
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3534:
-----------------------------------------
Github user JamesRTaylor commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/303#discussion_r192309043
--- Diff: phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/ViewIT.java
---
@@ -388,51 +435,65 @@ public void
testViewAndTableInDifferentSchemas(boolean isNamespaceMapped) throws
} catch (TableNotFoundException ignore) {
}
ddl = "DROP TABLE " + fullTableName1;
- validateCannotDropTableWithChildViewsWithoutCascade(conn,
fullTableName1);
ddl = "DROP VIEW " + fullViewName2;
conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
ddl = "DROP TABLE " + fullTableName1;
conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
}
-
+
@Test
- public void testDisallowDropOfColumnOnParentTable() throws Exception {
+ public void testDropOfColumnOnParentTableInvalidatesView() throws
Exception {
Connection conn = DriverManager.getConnection(getUrl());
+ String fullTableName = generateUniqueTableName();
+ String viewName = generateUniqueViewName();
+ splitSystemCatalog(Lists.newArrayList(fullTableName, viewName));
+
String ddl = "CREATE TABLE " + fullTableName + " (k1 INTEGER NOT
NULL, k2 INTEGER NOT NULL, v1 DECIMAL, CONSTRAINT pk PRIMARY KEY (k1, k2))" +
tableDDLOptions;
conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
- String viewName = "V_" + generateUniqueName();
ddl = "CREATE VIEW " + viewName + "(v2 VARCHAR, v3 VARCHAR) AS
SELECT * FROM " + fullTableName + " WHERE v1 = 1.0";
conn.createStatement().execute(ddl);
- try {
- conn.createStatement().execute("ALTER TABLE " + fullTableName
+ " DROP COLUMN v1");
- fail();
- } catch (SQLException e) {
-
assertEquals(SQLExceptionCode.CANNOT_MUTATE_TABLE.getErrorCode(),
e.getErrorCode());
+ conn.createStatement().execute("ALTER TABLE " + fullTableName + "
DROP COLUMN v1");
+ // TODO see if its possibel to prevent the dropping of a column
thats required by a child view (for its view where clause)
+ // the view should be invalid
--- End diff --
I think we should avoid needing any kind of locking (including a
checkAndPut). The scaling issues we ran into were caused by contention on a
lock for the parent. The same thing could happen again with a checkAndPut
(which is just locking the row during the check). I'd err on the side of
scalability and have a view be invalidated if its parent is deleted. I think
that's a more scalable solution.
> Support multi region SYSTEM.CATALOG table
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: Thomas D'Silva
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-3534-wip.patch
>
>
> Currently Phoenix requires that the SYSTEM.CATALOG table is single region
> based on the server-side row locks being held for operations that impact a
> table and all of it's views. For example, adding/removing a column from a
> base table pushes this change to all views.
> As an alternative to making the SYSTEM.CATALOG transactional (PHOENIX-2431),
> when a new table is created we can do a lazy cleanup of any rows that may be
> left over from a failed DDL call (kudos to [~lhofhansl] for coming up with
> this idea). To implement this efficiently, we'd need to also do PHOENIX-2051
> so that we can efficiently find derived views.
> The implementation would rely on an optimistic concurrency model based on
> checking our sequence numbers for each table/view before/after updating. Each
> table/view row would be individually locked for their change (metadata for a
> view or table cannot span regions due to our split policy), with the sequence
> number being incremented under lock and then returned to the client.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
