[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16497678#comment-16497678
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-3534:
-----------------------------------------
Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/303#discussion_r192317572
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/it/java/org/apache/phoenix/end2end/index/DropColumnIT.java ---
@@ -522,7 +523,8 @@ public void
helpTestDroppingIndexedColDropsViewIndex(boolean isMultiTenant) thro
byte[] cq = column.getColumnQualifierBytes();
// there should be a single row belonging to VIEWINDEX2
assertNotNull(viewIndex2 + " row is missing",
result.getValue(QueryConstants.DEFAULT_COLUMN_FAMILY_BYTES, cq));
- assertNull(results.next());
+ // TODO enable this after we drop view indexes than need a
dropped column
+// assertNull(results.next());
--- End diff --
This test now passes without commenting the assertNull.
> Support multi region SYSTEM.CATALOG table
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: PHOENIX-3534
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-3534
> Project: Phoenix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: James Taylor
> Assignee: Thomas D'Silva
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: PHOENIX-3534-wip.patch
>
>
> Currently Phoenix requires that the SYSTEM.CATALOG table is single region
> based on the server-side row locks being held for operations that impact a
> table and all of it's views. For example, adding/removing a column from a
> base table pushes this change to all views.
> As an alternative to making the SYSTEM.CATALOG transactional (PHOENIX-2431),
> when a new table is created we can do a lazy cleanup of any rows that may be
> left over from a failed DDL call (kudos to [~lhofhansl] for coming up with
> this idea). To implement this efficiently, we'd need to also do PHOENIX-2051
> so that we can efficiently find derived views.
> The implementation would rely on an optimistic concurrency model based on
> checking our sequence numbers for each table/view before/after updating. Each
> table/view row would be individually locked for their change (metadata for a
> view or table cannot span regions due to our split policy), with the sequence
> number being incremented under lock and then returned to the client.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
