Thank you Pedro for supporting the CDH branches... Looking forward to your patch.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 5:50 PM Pedro Boado <pbo...@apache.org> wrote: > Sorry for not being on top of this for a long time. I have ongoing work in > my laptop for this task. Give me a couple of days so I can review non > working bits and push it. > > On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 00:45 William Shen, <wills...@marinsoftware.com> > wrote: > > > Mahdi, > > I did a little bit of mailinglist/JIRA-diving, and found the following > > thread, which may be helpful to get you started in addition to the two > JIRA > > tickets/patches for previous work ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4372 and > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4956): > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > > From: Pedro Boado <pbo...@apache.org> > > Date: Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:17 PM > > Subject: Re: Phoenix 5.0 + Cloudera CDH 6.0 Integration > > To: <dev@phoenix.apache.org> > > > > > > Hi Curtis, > > > > As far as I am aware nobody is working on it. > > > > The approach I followed is, starting from master: > > - Change parent pom to use cloudera dependencies instead of Apache's for > > compilation > > - Make it compile (relatively easy for 4.x) > > - Make it pass tests (not that easy) > > - Once it passed, wrote the parcel module. > > > > There aren't a lot of code differences between cdh and base branches so > I'd > > try to follow the same approach - basing it on changes in the current > > differences-. > > > > I really think this effort is needed to try to bring both branches again > as > > close to each other as possible. Maybe some code differences are no > longer > > needed because CDH is already closer to the Apache version of Hadoop 3.0 > > and Hbase 2.0 than it was when I did the migration. > > > > Hope it helps, > > Pedro. > > > > On 14 Sep 2018 04:57, "Curtis Howard" <curtis.james.how...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Is there anyone working towards Phoenix 5.0 / Cloudera (CDH) 6.0 > > integration at this point? I could not find any related JIRA for this > > after a quick search, and wanted to check here first before adding one. > > > > If I were to attempt this myself, is there a suggested approach? I can > see > > from previous 4.x-cdh5.* branches supporting these releases that the > > changes for PHOENIX-4372 ( > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4372 > > ) > > move the builds to CDH dependencies - for example: > > > > > https://github.com/apache/phoenix/commit/024f0f22a5929da6f095dc0025b8e899e2f0c47b > > > > Would following the pattern of that commit (or attempting a cherry-pick) > > onto the the v5.0.0-HBase-2.0 tagged release ( > > https://github.com/apache/phoenix/tree/v5.0.0-HBase-2.0) be a reasonable > > starting point? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Curtis > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 1:28 PM William Shen <wills...@marinsoftware.com > > > > wrote: > > > > > Same here. Would love to help with adding more CDH versions, if someone > > > can help guide us on how to best go about it based on the current cdh > > > branches. > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 5:10 PM Mahdi Salarkia > <msalar...@box.com.invalid > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hi > > >> Is there a plan to release a Hbase-2.0-CDH (Cloudera 6.X) compatible > > >> version of Phoenix anytime soon? > > >> I can see Phoenix currently supports older versions of CDH (5.11, ...) > > but > > >> doesn't seem to be much work being done for the version 6. > > >> P.S : I'll be happy to help given instructions to help build the CDH > 6.X > > >> version > > >> > > >> Thanks > > >> Mehdi > > >> > > > > > >
