Yes, the tests are (and have been for some time) in a horrible shape for all branches and profiles.
I've spent a few days on it, and now at least we are at the point where the test runs do not hang indefinitely, or get randomly killed, but there are still a lot of flaky tests, and unexplained random failures. Been too optimistic, I've just seen a recent 4.x run test hang. Fortunately it's a spurious test that I'm about to move to the PQS repo in a few minutes. We do get a few successful test runs on each branch / profile combination, but they are few and far between. We do have a lot of old and no longer relevant jobs in Apache. I have deactivated a few myself. I support removing them to reduce confusion. I think that the only relevant ones are: https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Phoenix/job/PreCommit-PHOENIX-Build/ https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-4.x-matrix/ https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-master-matrix/ and possibly https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Phoenix/job/PhoenixFindTestTimeout/ though I haven't looked into the last one. István On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:30 AM la...@apache.org <la...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Josh. > > unfortunately > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-master-matrix/ > > has not passed a single time (at least for the past 15 runs) > > -- Lars > > > On Wednesday, April 8, 2020, 2:14:47 PM PDT, Josh Elser <els...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > It looks like the Phoenix-Master[1] build is now defunct after Istvan's > hbase profile work. New job over in [2] which is a matrix job for all of > HBase 2.0, 2.1, and 2.2. > > I think the question is whether or not we want to keep the old job > around? I think the answer is "no". > > [1] https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-master/ > [2] > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Phoenix/job/Phoenix-master-matrix/ > > On 4/8/20 2:00 PM, la...@apache.org wrote: > > Just looking at the Phoenix Jenkins jobs I noticed that was no build on > master since for 3 weeks. > > Is that in purpose? There were clearly changes on the master branch > since then. > > > > Cheers. > > > > -- Lars > > >
