Hi!

Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-6234 to cover this.
Feel free to take it if you have the time, as I may not be able to do this
in a timely manner.

Preparing PRs for more involved / low level changes for both branches is a
good practice anyway,
as there are other non-trivial differences between the branches.

On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 8:34 AM [email protected] <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
>
> I hope that we should applying PHOENIX-6010 to the 4.x, which could
> simplify back- and forward porting changes between the branches,or else for
> many JIRAs,we should
>
>
>
>
> prepare separated patches for 4.x and master.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 2020-11-25 00:52:26, "Geoffrey Jacoby" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >Istvan,
> >
> >Harmonizing the uses of guava between the two branches makes a lot of
> >sense. The current differences add to the merge conflicts when porting a
> >significant change between the branches, and make it easy to mistakenly
> use
> >an unshaded version of guava in the master branch (as I accidentally did
> >once. :-) )
> >
> >The main question I see is when to do it -- before the upcoming 4.16
> >release or afterward for a 4.16.1 or 4.17? That depends on release timing.
> >
> >Geoffrey
> >
> >On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:07 AM Istvan Toth <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I'd like to gather your opinion on replacing Guava with the
> >> phoenix-thirdparty shaded version on the 4.x branch.
> >>
> >> The change was not applied on 4.x, as the incompatibilities that the
> >> pre-shaded Guava version solves are not present on Hadoop 2/Hbase 1.
> >> However, the difference between the branches causes extra work, and
> >> frequent problems when porting code between the branches.
> >> Applying PHOENIX-6010 to the 4.x branch would make our lives easier,
> while
> >> having no negative effects that I know of (we already pull in
> >> phoenix-thirdparty via Omid 1.0.2)
> >>
> >> looking forward to hearing your opinion
> >> Istvan
> >>
>


-- 
*István Tóth* | Staff Software Engineer
[email protected] <https://www.cloudera.com>
[image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/>
[image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image:
Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: Cloudera
on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera>
<https://www.cloudera.com/>
------------------------------

Reply via email to