The vote has been canceled to address issues with JDK and Ipv6 interface in MacOS
Thanks, Rajeshbabu. On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 11:05 PM rajeshb...@apache.org < chrajeshbab...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, let me cancel the RC and create another RC after fixes with the > network interface and JDK 17. > > Thanks, Richard and Istvan for finding issues, and Cong Luo for your > support. > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:52 PM Istvan Toth <st...@cloudera.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> I have found another problem, Omid doesn't work with JDK 17. >> Not necessarily a blocker, but if we do another RC, it would be nice to >> include it. >> >> I'm also working on adding HBase 3 support, which requires a small API >> change (that also affects Phoenix) >> Again, not a blocker, but we'll have to do another release for 5.2 sooner >> than later for HBase 3 support. >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 9:11 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > Hi Istvan, >> > Using ipv6 on linux operating systems is available, so the reason may be >> > limited to users using Mac OS. And then, I using the ping the ipv6 >> address >> > on Mac OS, got the 'Unknown host', obviously macos uses ipv6 as the host >> > name. based on this default behavior of the operating system, I >> recommend >> > using macos with ipv4 and others with ipv4/ipv6. >> > >> > On 2024/01/18 06:54:14 Istvan Toth wrote: >> > > I think we should look into this a bit deeper. >> > > Why does this fail with IPv6 ? >> > > >> > > Are we explicitly binding TSO to the IPv4 address only ? >> > > Do we only do that in the tests, or does that happen in production ? >> > > Is it even possible to use Omid with IPv6 ? >> > > >> > > I suspect that fixing https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OMID-249 >> > would >> > > improve on this. >> > > >> > > Generally, I think that having a single IP per TSO can be a problem >> in a >> > > mixed IPv4 / IPv6 network, and with some network configurations. >> > > Maybe we should store the name of the active server instead of >> addresses >> > in >> > > ZK, and kick this problem down to the network/DNS administrator. >> > > >> > > If Omid is known to not work with IPV6 in 1.1.0 , then I'm OK with >> Cong's >> > > proposed solution, but if it breaks pre-existing Ipv6 support, then we >> > > should >> > > fix this properly for 1.1.1. >> > > >> > > We should create a follow-up ticket to make sure the Omid is IPv6 >> clean >> > for >> > > the next release at the very least. >> > > >> > > Istvan >> > > >> > > >> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 6:56 AM Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Richard, >> > > > Actually, I had the same issue before, but it was resolved >> locally: >> > if >> > > > the NIC was assigned both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, use ipv4 first. >> If >> > we >> > > > all think this is acceptable, then I will create a PR submission. >> > > > >> > > > On 2024/01/17 14:30:50 Richárd Antal wrote: >> > > > > -1 >> > > > > >> > > > > Signature: OK >> > > > > Checksum: OK >> > > > > mvn clean apache-rat:check: OK >> > > > > >> > > > > Changes and release notes: OK >> > > > > >> > > > > Built from source (1.8.0_241): OK >> > > > > - mvn clean install -DskipTests >> > > > > Ran tests on my MacBook locally: >> > > > > - mvn clean verify : Failed >> > > > > TestTSOClientConnectionToTSO had failing tests: >> > > > > testSuccessfulConnectionToTSOThroughZK and >> > > > > testSuccessOfTSOClientReconnectionsToARestartedTSOWithZKPublishing >> > > > > It might be because it uses IPv6 >> > > > > Some logs >> > > > > >> > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,858 INFO >> > > > > > [TestNGInvoker-testSuccessfulConnectionToTSOThroughZK()] >> > > > client.TSOClient: >> > > > > > * Current TSO host:port found in ZK: >> > > > > > [fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5]:52934 Epoch 0 >> > > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,859 INFO [tsofsm-0] client.TSOClient: >> Trying >> > to >> > > > > > connect to TSO [/fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5:52934] >> > > > > > 2024-01-17T15:17:45,863 ERROR [tsoclient-worker-0] >> > client.TSOClient: >> > > > > > Failed connection attempt to TSO >> > > > > > [/fe80:0:0:0:aede:48ff:fe00:1122%en5:52934] failed. Channel [id: >> > > > 0x9d8c0b44] >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > I’ve also tested the TestTSOClientConnectionToTSO on the 1.1.0 >> > release >> > > > > locally and that was successful (It used IPv4). >> > > > > I think this is a regression on Mac and it would be nice to fix >> > before >> > > > the >> > > > > release. >> > > > > >> > > > > Richard >> > > > > >> > > > > Cong Luo <l...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2024. jan. 11., Cs, >> > 3:52): >> > > > > >> > > > > > +1 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > I did a basic test last month in the test environment (fully >> > > > distributed) >> > > > > > based on phoenix 5.1.3 + omid 1.1.1 and did not find a blocking >> > issue. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 2024/01/09 12:53:28 "rajeshb...@apache.org" wrote: >> > > > > > > Please vote on this Apache phoenix omid release candidate, >> > > > > > > phoenix-omid-1.1.1RC0 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The VOTE will remain open for at least 72 hours. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache phoenix omid 1.1.1 >> > > > > > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ... >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The tag to be voted on is 1.1.1RC0: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/phoenix-omid/tree/1.1.1RC0 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The release files, including signatures, digests, as well as >> > > > CHANGES.md >> > > > > > > and RELEASENOTES.md included in this RC can be found at: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/phoenix-omid-1.1.1RC0/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Maven artifacts are available in a staging repository at: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachephoenix-1251/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Artifacts were signed with the 0x2CC0FD99 key which can be >> found >> > in: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/phoenix/KEYS >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > To learn more about Apache phoenix omid, please see >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://phoenix.apache.org/ >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Thanks, >> > > > > > > Rajeshbabu. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> > > *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> > > cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> > > [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> >> > > [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image: >> > > Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: >> > Cloudera >> > > on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> >> > > ------------------------------ >> > > ------------------------------ >> > > >> > >> >> >> -- >> *István Tóth* | Sr. Staff Software Engineer >> *Email*: st...@cloudera.com >> cloudera.com <https://www.cloudera.com> >> [image: Cloudera] <https://www.cloudera.com/> >> [image: Cloudera on Twitter] <https://twitter.com/cloudera> [image: >> Cloudera on Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/cloudera> [image: >> Cloudera >> on LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/cloudera> >> ------------------------------ >> ------------------------------ >> >
