-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/154/#review72
-----------------------------------------------------------


So, it looks like the ANTLR parser is already in trunk. This might have to go 
into 0.8 after it's released, left as an integration option for those who roll 
their own.


trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestParamSubPreproc.java
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/154/#comment65>

    Reliance on AvroStorage seems unnecessary. Use one of the engines already 
in trunk?


- Dmitriy


On 2010-12-09 01:26:33, Lin Guo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/154/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-12-09 01:26:33)
> 
> 
> Review request for pig.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Summary:
> 
> We want to extend pig parser to allow function arguments to contain multiple 
> lines as well as string list, like
> 
> STORE data INTO 'testOut' 
> USING storage.avro.AvroStorage (
> '{"debug": 5,
>   "data": "/user/lguo/testOut/ComponentActTracking4/part-m-00000.avro",
>   "field0": "int",
>   "field1": "def:browser_id",
>   "field3": "def:act_content" } '
> );
> 
> 
> This addresses bug PIG-1749.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1749
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   trunk/src/org/apache/pig/impl/logicalLayer/parser/QueryParser.jjt 1040872 
>   trunk/test/org/apache/pig/test/TestParamSubPreproc.java 1040872 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/154/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
>      [exec] 
>      [exec] +1 overall.  
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or 
> modified tests.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning 
> messages.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total 
> number of javac compiler warnings.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs 
> warnings.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec]     +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the 
> total number of release audit warnings.
>      [exec] 
>      [exec] 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Lin
> 
>

Reply via email to