Me too, I am interested in coming, Romain
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Santhosh Srinivasan <[email protected]>wrote: > I am planning to attend. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:58 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Pig developer meeting in February > > I believe we have critical mass so the meeting is on! > > If you have not responded yet but planning to attend, please, let me know. > > Thanks, > > Olga > > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Le Dem [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:21 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February > > Me too. > Julien > > > On 1/27/11 4:09 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok yeah I'll come :). > > > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Olga Natkovich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > While there is a lively discussion on this thread, I have not actually > > gotten any responses to having the meeting with exception of 1 person :). > > > > Please, let me know by the end of the week if you are planning to attend. > > If we don't get at least a few more responses I suggest we postpone > > the meeting. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Olga > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:04 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February > > > > Right, we do partition filtering, but not true predicate pushdown. > > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Daniel Dai <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Are you talking about LoadMetadata.setPartitionFilter? > > > PartitionFilterOptimizer will do that. > > > > > > Daniel > > > > > > > > > Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: > > > > > >> I may be wrong but I think predicate pushdown is designed for, but > > >> not actually implemented in the current LoadPushdown interface (you > > >> can only push projections). If I am wrong, that's great.. but if > > >> not, that would > > be > > >> an important feature to add, as people are trying to connect Pig to > > >> "smart" > > >> storage systems like rdbmses, HBase, and Cassandra more and more. > > >> I > > think > > >> we only kind of simulate this with partition keys info, which is > > >> not always sufficient > > >> > > >> D > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Julien Le Dem > > >> <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>> If making Pig Thread safe (i.e.: two threads running a different > > >>> pig > > >>> script) is important then we need to change some of the APIs from > > static > > >>> singleton access to a dependency injection pattern. > > >>> In that case, this should probably be done before 1.0 For example: > > >>> UDFContext should be passed to the UDF after construction (similar > > >>> to the SevrletContext in Servlet or the way Hadoop passes the > > >>> context to tasks) Also a clearly separated API that does not > > >>> depend on the Pig implementation would help. > > >>> For example UDFContext is in org.apache.pig.impl.util when it > > >>> would be better in org.apache.pig.api (Or at least an interface > > >>> defining it) > > >>> > > >>> Julien > > >>> > > >>> On 1/24/11 10:14 AM, "Olga Natkovich" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Hi Guys, > > >>> > > >>> I think it is time for us to have another meeting. Yahoo would be > > >>> happy to host if this works for everybody. How about Wednesday, > > >>> 2/9 4-6 pm. > > >>> Please, > > >>> let us know if you are planning to attend and if the date/time > > >>> works > > for > > >>> you. > > >>> > > >>> Things that come to mind to discuss and as always feel free to > > >>> suggest > > >>> others: > > >>> > > >>> - Error handling proposal - this might be easier to finalize > > >>> face-to-face > > >>> - Pig 0.9 plan > > >>> - Pig Roadmap beyond 0.9 > > >>> o What do we want to do in Pig.next? > > >>> o Are we ready for Pig 1.0 > > >>> > > >>> Olga > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > >
