Hi folks, Any chance someone took notes? :) D
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > I got sick and won't be able to make it. Would love to see some notes > after the meeting :). > > D > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >> Hi Guys, >> >> We are looking forward to see you tomorrow at 4 pm at Yahoo campus in >> Sunnyvale. >> >> Yahoo address is >> >> 701 First Ave. >> Sunnyvale, CA 94089 >> >> We are in building E. Please, ask for Alan or me at the reception. >> >> Olga >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] >> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:42 AM >> To: dev@pig.apache.org >> Subject: REMINDER: Pig developer meeting in February >> >> Hi guys, >> >> This is just a reminder that the meeting will be held next Wednesday, 2/9 >> 4-6 pm at Yahoo campus. >> >> If you have not yet responded but planning to attend, please, let me know. >> >> Olga >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Santhosh Srinivasan [mailto:s...@yahoo-inc.com] >> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:36 PM >> To: dev@pig.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Pig developer meeting in February >> >> I am planning to attend. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com] >> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 12:58 PM >> To: dev@pig.apache.org >> Subject: RE: Pig developer meeting in February >> >> I believe we have critical mass so the meeting is on! >> >> If you have not responded yet but planning to attend, please, let me know. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Olga >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Julien Le Dem [mailto:led...@yahoo-inc.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:21 PM >> To: dev@pig.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February >> >> Me too. >> Julien >> >> >> On 1/27/11 4:09 PM, "Dmitriy Ryaboy" <dvrya...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ok yeah I'll come :). >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >> >>> While there is a lively discussion on this thread, I have not actually >>> gotten any responses to having the meeting with exception of 1 person :). >>> >>> Please, let me know by the end of the week if you are planning to attend. >>> If we don't get at least a few more responses I suggest we postpone >>> the meeting. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Olga >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvrya...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 6:04 PM >>> To: dev@pig.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Pig developer meeting in February >>> >>> Right, we do partition filtering, but not true predicate pushdown. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Daniel Dai <jiany...@yahoo-inc.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Are you talking about LoadMetadata.setPartitionFilter? >>> > PartitionFilterOptimizer will do that. >>> > >>> > Daniel >>> > >>> > >>> > Dmitriy Ryaboy wrote: >>> > >>> >> I may be wrong but I think predicate pushdown is designed for, but >>> >> not actually implemented in the current LoadPushdown interface (you >>> >> can only push projections). If I am wrong, that's great.. but if >>> >> not, that would >>> be >>> >> an important feature to add, as people are trying to connect Pig to >>> >> "smart" >>> >> storage systems like rdbmses, HBase, and Cassandra more and more. >>> >> I >>> think >>> >> we only kind of simulate this with partition keys info, which is >>> >> not always sufficient >>> >> >>> >> D >>> >> >>> >> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Julien Le Dem >>> >> <led...@yahoo-inc.com> >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> If making Pig Thread safe (i.e.: two threads running a different >>> >>> pig >>> >>> script) is important then we need to change some of the APIs from >>> static >>> >>> singleton access to a dependency injection pattern. >>> >>> In that case, this should probably be done before 1.0 For example: >>> >>> UDFContext should be passed to the UDF after construction (similar >>> >>> to the SevrletContext in Servlet or the way Hadoop passes the >>> >>> context to tasks) Also a clearly separated API that does not >>> >>> depend on the Pig implementation would help. >>> >>> For example UDFContext is in org.apache.pig.impl.util when it >>> >>> would be better in org.apache.pig.api (Or at least an interface >>> >>> defining it) >>> >>> >>> >>> Julien >>> >>> >>> >>> On 1/24/11 10:14 AM, "Olga Natkovich" <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Hi Guys, >>> >>> >>> >>> I think it is time for us to have another meeting. Yahoo would be >>> >>> happy to host if this works for everybody. How about Wednesday, >>> >>> 2/9 4-6 pm. >>> >>> Please, >>> >>> let us know if you are planning to attend and if the date/time >>> >>> works >>> for >>> >>> you. >>> >>> >>> >>> Things that come to mind to discuss and as always feel free to >>> >>> suggest >>> >>> others: >>> >>> >>> >>> - Error handling proposal - this might be easier to finalize >>> >>> face-to-face >>> >>> - Pig 0.9 plan >>> >>> - Pig Roadmap beyond 0.9 >>> >>> o What do we want to do in Pig.next? >>> >>> o Are we ready for Pig 1.0 >>> >>> >>> >>> Olga >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >
