I think we are good to branch. If the gem thing is not a big change, I'm ok with putting it into the branch post-factum.
Daniel -- will you be managing this release? D On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm gonna test JRuby gems tomorrow, in hopes it can go in 0.11. > > Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com > > On Oct 11, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Julien Le Dem <jul...@twitter.com> wrote: > >> I'll be looking into this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2925 >> Same thing, it can be added to branch + trunk >> +1 >> Julien >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Bill Graham <billgra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 for me. >>> >>> There's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2756 which tracks a few >>> documentation issues that should block Pig 0.11, but they can also be done >>> on the trunk and merged to the branch. Gianmarco, you can add a rank >>> subtask there to serve as a reminder. >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales < >>> g...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> We are missing some documentation on the RANK but I guess we could add >>> that >>>> to the branch and trunk in parallel. >>>> All the patches I was keeping an eye on are in. >>>> >>>> So +1 for me. >>>> -- >>>> Gianmarco >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Jonathan Coveney <jcove...@gmail.com >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I think all of the major patches are in, no? Now it's just bug testing? >>>>> Just wanted to touch base on where we are at with this. >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at >>> billgra...@gmail.com going forward.* >>>
