Thanks, I'll test the gem thing tomorrow and update the JIRA. Russell Jurney twitter.com/rjurney
On Oct 11, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we are good to branch. > If the gem thing is not a big change, I'm ok with putting it into the > branch post-factum. > > Daniel -- will you be managing this release? > > D > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Russell Jurney > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm gonna test JRuby gems tomorrow, in hopes it can go in 0.11. >> >> Russell Jurney http://datasyndrome.com >> >> On Oct 11, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Julien Le Dem <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'll be looking into this: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2925 >>> Same thing, it can be added to branch + trunk >>> +1 >>> Julien >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Bill Graham <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 for me. >>>> >>>> There's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-2756 which tracks a few >>>> documentation issues that should block Pig 0.11, but they can also be done >>>> on the trunk and merged to the branch. Gianmarco, you can add a rank >>>> subtask there to serve as a reminder. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> We are missing some documentation on the RANK but I guess we could add >>>> that >>>>> to the branch and trunk in parallel. >>>>> All the patches I was keeping an eye on are in. >>>>> >>>>> So +1 for me. >>>>> -- >>>>> Gianmarco >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Jonathan Coveney <[email protected] >>>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I think all of the major patches are in, no? Now it's just bug testing? >>>>>> Just wanted to touch base on where we are at with this. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Note that I'm no longer using my Yahoo! email address. Please email me at >>>> [email protected] going forward.* >>>>
