[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14335810#comment-14335810
 ] 

Daniel Dai commented on PIG-4426:
---------------------------------

Also note current counter based approach is not scalable. It would easily hit 
system counter limit. Need to switch to a hdfs file based approach.

> RowNumber(simple) Rank not producing correct results
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-4426
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4426
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.15.0
>            Reporter: Koji Noguchi
>            Assignee: Koji Noguchi
>             Fix For: 0.15.0
>
>         Attachments: pig-4426-v01.txt, pig-4426-v02.txt, pig-4426-v03.txt
>
>
> After PIG-4392, started seeing TestRank3.testRankWithSplitInMap (and some 
> others) failing with 
> {noformat}
> Comparing actual and expected results.  expected:<[(1,1,2), (1,1,2), (1,3,1), 
> (2,1,2), (3,1,2), (3,2,3), (3,2,4), (4,2,3), (5,2,4), (5,3,1)]> but 
> was:<[(1,1,2), (1,1,2), (3,2,3), (3,2,4), (5,3,1)]>
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to