[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4426?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14336605#comment-14336605
]
Koji Noguchi commented on PIG-4426:
-----------------------------------
+1 on moving away from counter based approach. (I believe Tez version of Rank
already does that.)
> RowNumber(simple) Rank not producing correct results
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-4426
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4426
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 0.15.0
> Reporter: Koji Noguchi
> Assignee: Koji Noguchi
> Fix For: 0.15.0
>
> Attachments: pig-4426-v01.txt, pig-4426-v02.txt, pig-4426-v03.txt
>
>
> After PIG-4392, started seeing TestRank3.testRankWithSplitInMap (and some
> others) failing with
> {noformat}
> Comparing actual and expected results. expected:<[(1,1,2), (1,1,2), (1,3,1),
> (2,1,2), (3,1,2), (3,2,3), (3,2,4), (4,2,3), (5,2,4), (5,3,1)]> but
> was:<[(1,1,2), (1,1,2), (3,2,3), (3,2,4), (5,3,1)]>
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
