[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4608?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16327602#comment-16327602
 ] 

Will Lauer commented on PIG-4608:
---------------------------------

While up in the middle of the night dealing with a sick child, I realized there 
was way to make the parsing sane if updates, adds and deletes were to be 
included all in a single statement. How does this syntax look?

{code}
a = load 'input' using mock.Storage() as (x:chararray, y:chararray, z:long);
b = foreach a generate x+y as q, y, z:long;
c = foreach a update "prefix"+x as x, (chararray)(z+1) as z:charrarray;
d = foreach a delete x, z;
e = foreach a {
           nextInt = z+1;
           update nextInt as z:int
    }
f = foreach a
    add {
           1+oldCol as new:long,
           somethingElse as new2
     } delete {
           colToRemove,
           otherColToRemove
     } update {
           1+oldCol2 as updatedCol,
           "1"+oldCol2 as updatedTypeCol:chararray
     };
g = foreach a {
           nextInt = z+1;
           add {
                  1+oldCol as new:long,
                  somethingElse as new2
           } delete {
                  colToRemove,
                  otherColToRemove
           } update {
                  1+oldCol2 as updatedCol,
                  "1"+oldCol2 as updatedTypeCol:chararray
           };
    }
{code}

In this case, the surrounding curly braces would be required if putting 
multiple clauses in a single FOREACH. Add, delete, or update could all be 
included alone without the extra curly braces, but if you want to combine them, 
the curly braces would be required.

> FOREACH ... UPDATE
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: PIG-4608
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-4608
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Haley Thrapp
>            Priority: Major
>
> I would like to propose a new command in Pig, FOREACH...UPDATE.
> Syntactically, it would look much like FOREACH … GENERATE.
> Example:
> Input data:
> (1,2,3)
> (2,3,4)
> (3,4,5)
> -- Load the data
> three_numbers = LOAD 'input_data'
> USING PigStorage()
> AS (f1:int, f2:int, f3:int);
> -- Sum up the row
> updated = FOREACH three_numbers UPDATE
> 5 as f1,
> f1+f2 as new_sum
> ;
> Dump updated;
> (5,2,3,3)
> (5,3,4,5)
> (5,4,5,7)
> Fields to update must be specified by alias. Any fields in the UPDATE that do 
> not match an existing field will be appended to the end of the tuple.
> This command is particularly desirable in scripts that deal with a large 
> number of fields (in the 20-200 range). Often, we need to only make 
> modifications to a few fields. The FOREACH ... UPDATE statement, allows the 
> developer to focus on the actual logical changes instead of having to list 
> all of the fields that are also being passed through.
> My team has prototyped this with changes to FOREACH ... GENERATE. We believe 
> this can be done with changes to the parser and the creation of a new 
> LOUpdate. No physical plan changes should be needed because we will leverage 
> what LOGenerate does.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to