I think we should include it in this release
1. It will not affect existing schemas. I just completed the upgrade
scenario testing suggested by Subbu. I've added the steps and the results
in the PR
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/5399#issuecomment-631114033
2. For users of 0.4.0 we can encourage them to use only DateTimeFieldSpec.
It is possible we find some issues in that, because they'll be the first
real users. In that case, they can always keep using TimeFieldSpec and we
fix the issues in 0.5.0.
3. If we do not include this change in this release, we will not even find
out the issues in using only DateTimeFieldSpec, because all the production
setups will still be using the old schemas. They will only help in testing
that the old schemas work.
4. If we push this to 0.5.0, the Phase 2 (true deprecation) will get pushed
to 0.6.0

<paw...@illinois.edu>


On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:28 AM kishore g <g.kish...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If we have thought of all the cases and know that it won't impact existing
> - why delay it to the next release?. The earlier we start pushing users to
> use datetimespec the better it is for us.
>
> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 10:20 AM Subbu Subramaniam <mcvsu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I meant to suggest  release 0.4.0 excluding PR 5399 (date time spec)
> >
> > -Subbu
> >
> > On 2020/05/19 17:18:13, Subbu Subramaniam <mcvsu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > On the other hand, it may be wise to release 0.4.0 without this change.
> > >
> > > Those of us who pick up changes regularly from the master can verify
> > that there is no incompatibility inadvertently introduced  by this change
> > (Not everything can be caught by review)
> > >
> > > And then we can push this change in 0.5.0, not worrying about another
> > backward incomaptibility introduced trying to fix a previous incompat.
> > >
> > > My suggestion
> > >
> > > -Subbu
> > >
> > > On 2020/05/19 16:36:16, Neha Pawar <neha.pawa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Please let's wait for
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/5399 the
> > > > DateTimeFieldSpec support. I have 2 reviews, waiting on just 1 more.
> > > > Will keep you posted.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > *Neha Pawar*
> > > >
> > > > <paw...@illinois.edu>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 6:03 PM H <hbwan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Will wait for a few more diffs and revisit the release the coming
> > week.
> > > > > Please let me know if you are planning on some diffs and would like
> > to get
> > > > > them in the release.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 8:09 PM H <hbwan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for letting me know Mayank!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 4:43 PM Mayank Shrivastava
> > > > > > <mshri...@linkedin.com.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> I am done with the initial implementation of ThetaSketch, the
> last
> > > > > commit
> > > > > >> happened yesterday.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Cheers,
> > > > > >> Mayank
> > > > > >> ________________________________
> > > > > >> From: Mayank Shrivastava <mshri...@linkedin.com>
> > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 10:33 AM
> > > > > >> To: dev@pinot.apache.org <dev@pinot.apache.org>
> > > > > >> Subject: Re: Preparing for the upcoming Pinot 0.4.0 release
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> While ThetaSketch major checkins have gone in, I am still
> working
> > on
> > > > > >> making it work end to end. Will update on progress by EoD
> > tomorrow.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Mayank
> > > > > >> ________________________________
> > > > > >> From: H <hbwan...@gmail.com>
> > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 9:23 PM
> > > > > >> To: dev@pinot.apache.org <dev@pinot.apache.org>
> > > > > >> Subject: Re: Preparing for the upcoming Pinot 0.4.0 release
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Bumping this thread for 0.4.0 release.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The features called out earlier are either merged or close to
> > being
> > > > > >> merged.
> > > > > >> Kudos to the feature owners for making it in.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I plan to use the master branch as of this *coming Friday May
> > 15th, 7pm
> > > > > >> PST* as
> > > > > >> the release candidate.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I will send another email with the branch info before cutting
> the
> > > > > release.
> > > > > >> Please let me know if there are questions or concerns.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > >> Haibo
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:11 PM H <hbwan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > Sounds good. Will revisit this next week.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 22:08 kishore g <g.kish...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >> Let’s wait for another week.
> > > > > >> >> Want to get the following features
> > > > > >> >> In
> > > > > >> >> - theta sketch
> > > > > >> >> - post Agg
> > > > > >> >> - range index
> > > > > >> >> - timespec to datetimespec
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 9:44 PM H <hbwan...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> >> > Hi Pinot community,
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > I'm preparing for the upcoming Pinot 0.4.0 release. I plan
> > to use
> > > > > the
> > > > > >> >> > master branch as of this coming Friday May 1st, 7pm PST.
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > I will send another email with the branch info before
> > cutting the
> > > > > >> >> > release. Please let me know if there are questions or
> > concerns.
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >> > Thanks,
> > > > > >> >> > Haibo
> > > > > >> >> >
> > > > > >> >>
> > > > > >> > --
> > > > > >> > Sent from my iPhone
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pinot.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@pinot.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to