I'm not sure of the current implementation, but if by doing a selection
indirectly, you fire an event for each selection, as it is selected in the
set being set, then that could be inefficient or at least push the burden of
inefficiency into the client. If it fires after all of them have been
selected, then it should be okay. I think some platforms, can't recall
immediately, allow you to receive each individual selection, if you want it,
then a post selection event that has all of them. It probably uses a timer
underneath to determine which selections get grouped together.


-----Original Message-----
From: Sandro Martini [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 5:53 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RFC] Selection change events

Hi Greg,
for me the change is right, and maybe with this application selection
listeners could see what to do (and when it's the case ignoring the
"indirect change" event, like today) ... and on all selectable
components, right ?
Have you an idea on the performance impact of this change on
tables/trees and other containers with many elements inside ?

Bye,
Sandro

Reply via email to