It's not that tough to re-run the release script, so I think we should just add the headers and re-gen the release.
On Dec 16, 2010, at 7:57 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Sandro Martini > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> Please vote to publish this release by Friday, December 17 22:00 GMT. >> I agree with Niclas, we should have more time ... at least including one >> week-end. >> >> I've done a quick review of downloaded files, but I've seen 3 sources >> (.java) that doesn't have the Apache License Header, and an html page (all >> listed here: >> http://people.apache.org/~tvolkert/dist/pivot/v2.0/apache-pivot-2.0-src.rat.txt >> ): I don't know if this is this blocking for the release ... Niclas (and >> others), what do you say ? > > I probably belong in the "lenient" camp. Copyright applies even if > there are no source headers. > > My recommendation; > > 1. Don't block the release, but if the release manager feels it is > important, he can choose to cut a new one. > 2. Add the source headers now. > 3. Make RAT part of the release build. > 4. Use IDEAs "Copyright plugin" or similar in Eclipse (if any). > > > > Cheers > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/3xugrbk > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/24svnvk > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug
