Can you provide some context with this message? I don't remember the details of the thread.
I believe I was trying to get at the use case for providing custom Resources implementations. I'd guess that there is a stronger case for doing this on the server than there is on the client. On Jul 13, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Sandro Martini wrote: > They are server side apps, but even if their usage from client side is > limited I think we could leave open the door for subclasses (and maybe with > additional implementation under pivot-extras or similar), ok ? > > Of course with default formats and settings of the current implementation. > > Bye > Il giorno 12/lug/2011 00:16, "Greg Brown" <gk_br...@verizon.net> ha scritto:
