Yep, it stalled when I had to head off and has since been blocked by my total inability to phrase my 'requirements' as a use case for you.
I do intend to get back to it ASAP though. On 14 July 2011 04:26, Greg Brown <gk_br...@verizon.net> wrote: > I believe I was trying to get at the use case for providing custom Resources > implementations. I'd guess that there is a stronger case for doing this on > the server than there is on the client. > > On Jul 13, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Sandro Martini wrote: > >> They are server side apps, but even if their usage from client side is >> limited I think we could leave open the door for subclasses (and maybe with >> additional implementation under pivot-extras or similar), ok ? >> >> Of course with default formats and settings of the current implementation. >> >> Bye >> Il giorno 12/lug/2011 00:16, "Greg Brown" <gk_br...@verizon.net> ha scritto: > >
