Yes, releases are generally tagged. But I'd hold off on creating the tag until the QA part is done.
On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Sandro Martini wrote: > Thinking on it I think that we could start next week the proposal for the > 2.0.1 , but please don't create a branch in svn, maybe create a tag instead, > so in the meantime we can continue to work on 2.0.x ... do you like this ? > What others think ? > > Bye > Il giorno 05/ago/2011 20:12, "Roger L. Whitcomb" <roger.whitc...@ingres.com> > ha scritto: >> I'd like to propose we release 2.0.1 ASAP. I know there are a few >> things Sandro still has on his plate, but I'm thinking they are not >> crucial to have in 2.0.1 necessarily. >> >> >> >> Can I get help testing to make sure everything is stable? I've been >> testing with our app for literally months now, tracking head revs of >> "trunk" and it is certainly very stable for us, and I'd like to get a >> released version with the crucial bug fixes, etc. that are contained in >> it. >> >> >> >> Comments? Thanks. >> >> >> >> Roger Whitcomb >> >> Architect, Engineering >> >> Ingres Corporation >> >> roger.whitc...@ingres.com <mailto:roger.whitc...@ingres.com> >> >> >> >> PHONE +1 650.587.5596 >> >> FAX +1 650.587.5550 >> >> >> >> www.ingres.com <http://www.ingres.com/> >> >> >> >> This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the use of the >> recipient named above. It may contain confidential, proprietary, or >> legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, >> you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or >> distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this >> transmission in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and >> delete the original transmission and all copies from your system. >> >> >>
