Hi Tim,
I thought of reading an array of 3 bytes ... that should produce an odd number
of bytes in the response (Don't forget to request another item after that)
Chris
Am 13.02.19, 15:55 schrieb "Tim Mitsch" <t.mit...@pragmaticindustries.de>:
Hi Chris
I thought about that too, but did not evaluate if something like this can
happen.
You mean something like odd-adress to even padding?!
But the SPS is answering the base types requested isn't it, so there is no
basic type that has an odd length in byte except BYTE, USINT and all other one
byte long datatypes, or am i wrong.
But before preparing BugFix-RC we'll should check this, you're right. Later
this day i can support with this.
Best
Tim
Am 13.02.19, 15:42 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>:
Hi all,
last night I had another idea what we should check before triggering a
new release ...
I was sort of wondering why we have to add an empty byte if the data is
only one byte long.
Then I thought ... could it be that the device is using a WORD padding?
So it expects every part to be of an even number of bytes.
If that was the case, if we read for example 3 bytes, we would get an
additional fill byte too.
Then we should verify and eventually fix this before pushing out a
0.3.1.
Chris
Am 11.02.19, 19:26 schrieb "Julian Feinauer"
<j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de>:
Hey all,
I agree we should do this of 0.3 branch. Would be a good exercise
with cherry picking and so.
I suggest that I do the rm and Tim does all steps with me {we're
working together}.
Is this okay Tim or do you want to do everything on your own.?
Julian
Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet
-------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: Bugfix-Release 0.3.1
Von: Christofer Dutz
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Cc:
Hi Tim,
I have no objections ... I guess you are in possession of a signed
key? (I think us signing stuff at the Finka ... but if not, Julian could always
sign your key)
And having more people able to release is never a bad thing.
If this bug is causing you to have problems in production, I agree
and we should send a bugfix version (That would be released from the existing
0.3 branch).
So the bugfix would have to be cherry-picked into that branch. I
doubt it qualifies for a full release (0.4.0) as the only other significant
change would have been my work on the dynamic driver.
Chris
Am 11.02.19, 16:13 schrieb "Tim Mitsch"
<t.mit...@pragmaticindustries.de>:
Hallo everybody
As we just released version 0.3, we found (and already fixed
within develop-branch – thanks to Chris) a bug regarding exchange of
One-Byte-long variables within S7, where sometimes a filling Byte hast o be
used.
This maybe leads to some strange behavior and it maybe be
better to release a bugfix version where this bug is fixed.
Julian (thanks for taking care about release of 0.3) as leader
and supervisor and me (I have to learn it as well) would care about the release
process for this bugfix release.
What do you think?
Best
Tim
