Hi Chris,
I just wanted to ask where the documentation was located inside the project
so I could add my part.

Etienne

Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 20:19, Strljic, Matthias Milan <
matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
>
> i am there a bit sorry but the work catched me a bit to much. I try my
> best to close the gap soon :)
>
>
> Greetings
> Matthias
>
> ________________________________
> Von: Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> Gesendet: Montag, 4. Mai 2020 19:39:18
> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: How about documenting more?
>
> Hi Etienne,
>
> I was hoping you would say that ... same as I hope Matthias could possibly
> which up the same for the OPC UA driver ;-)
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> Am 04.05.20, 18:39 schrieb "Robinet, Etienne" <43...@etu.he2b.be>:
>
>     Hi Chris,
>     I guess I could do the documentation for the EIP Driver ;)
>
>     Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 17:30, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
> a
>     écrit :
>
>     > Hi all,
>     >
>     > I just wanted to help someone, who asked me: “How can I read from an
> OPC
>     > UA device?” and I had to look into the source-code to answer the
> questions.
>     > It would be great if someone working on a driver could also find
> some time
>     > to write the pretty simple documentations we have on the user-page.
>     >
>     > Right now the following drivers are missing documentation:
>     >
>     >   *   AB-ETH
>     >
>     > -          ADS/AMS (Actually the content there is completely not what
>     > should be there)
>     > -          BACnet/IP
>     > -          DeltaV
>     > -          DF1
>     > -          EtherNet/IP
>     > -          KNXnet/IP
>     > -          OPC UA
>     > -          Simulated
>     > (As references please have a look at: S7, Firmata, Modbus)
>     >
>     > Also I think it would be great if we could also start documenting the
>     > integrations as well as our tools (OPM, Connection Pool, Scraper)
>     >
>     > So if you folks have a few cycles left over, would be super cool if
> we
>     > could improve here.
>     >
>     > Chris
>     >
>
>

Reply via email to