Let me come back to the question: who would be willing and able to work on 
something like that... Or I'll create a new thread and we can continue naming 
technologies here ;-)

Holen Sie sich Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
________________________________
From: Gaurav P <g...@gpism.com>
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2022 3:29:36 AM
To: dev@plc4x.apache.org <dev@plc4x.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Implement a Java GUI application for browsing PLCs with 
PLC4X

I think Flutter can be  a cross-platform UI toolkit to implement  GUI on
desktops (Windows/Linux/Mac) , mobile (android/IoS), and web ... via local
API Proxy
I would be interested in contributing

On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 2:31 AM Sebastian Rühl <sru...@apache.org> wrote:

> Now we still missing JavaEE in the proposal List XD
>
> - Sebastian
>
> On 2022/06/23 16:54:35 Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
> > I agree that electron is a great tool.
> > It gives you all the problems you had with desktop combined with all
> > complexity of modern web development. ;-)
> >
> > If goal is getting data from protocol available via serial port then
> > electron is an unnecessary complication. You need to launch local server
> > with an API to let gui receive data (assuming gui is in js or similar).
> > Given that we don't have many UI folks who do webdev on daily basis I am
> > afraid we could be easily burred by that part.
> >
> > Sure, without trying we just speculate, so anyone who wants promote
> > specific tech is welcome to start working on the thing. :)
> >
> > BTW for further comparisons, I recall there is also a wx-widgets toolkit
> > which is cross platform.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Łukasz
> >
> > On 23.06.2022 18:31, Lukas Ott wrote:
> > > What about https://cordova.apache.org/ and creating an Electron App?
> > >
> > >
> https://cordova.apache.org/docs/en/11.x/guide/platforms/electron/index.html
> > >
> > > So we can deploy easily to all kinds of platforms?
> > >
> > > Example for a very successful Frontend application:
> > > https://github.com/jgraph/drawio
> > >
> > > Interesting discussion a few years ago:
> > > https://twitter.com/tuxtor/status/1167454864932319232
> > >
> > > -> Electron is de facto the standard for Desktop Applications at least
> at
> > > the moment.
> > >
> > > https://medium.com/the-web-tub/electron-on-cordova-29ede5d6d789
> > >
> > >
> https://www.reddit.com/r/javahelp/comments/lrg2ho/web_app_vs_java_fx_vs_electron_js/
> > >
> > > My five cents to this conversation ;-)
> > >
> > > Luk
> > >
> > > Am Do., 23. Juni 2022 um 16:19 Uhr schrieb Sebastian Rühl <
> sru...@apache.org
> > >> :
> > >
> > >> I would vote doing it as a terminal application with tcell :D
> > >>
> > >> https://github.com/gdamore/tcell
> > >> https://github.com/gcla/gowid
> > >>
> > >> good example for that is termshark
> > >>
> > >> - Sebastian
> > >>
> > >> On 2022/06/23 13:47:29 Christofer Dutz wrote:
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> Great to see this discussion here :-)
> > >>>
> > >>> Well, I agree that going down the lane of basing something on
> NetBeans,
> > >> Eclipse, IntelliJ, VSCode makes the tool a bit too big and
> complicated.
> > >> Integrating something based on Eclipse into our build also would add
> > >> Nightmares to that.
> > >>>
> > >>> I probably would have chosen Java/Kotlin with JavaFX ... but I would
> > >> say, those who actually work on it should choose what they are
> comfortable
> > >> with.
> > >>>
> > >>> So perhaps we could see who's actually interested, willing and able
> to
> > >> help on the coding and then these people should discuss how to
> implement
> > >> it. I'll be available as a "Mentor" if any help is needed in
> integrating
> > >> that into the build or if PLC4X related help is needed.
> > >>>
> > >>> Chris
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Stephen Snow <s40...@gmail.com>
> > >>> Sent: Donnerstag, 23. Juni 2022 15:31
> > >>> To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Implement a Java GUI application for browsing
> > >> PLCs with PLC4X
> > >>>
> > >>> Truly,
> > >>> To scaffold an application that can be rapidly utilized in
> Java/Kotlin I
> > >> would strongly recommend Quarkus from https://quarkus.io/. It likes
> to
> > >> use the GraalVM and readily can build out to native or native in
> container.
> > >> It can be deployed ootb in development mode with ci happening as you
> > >> develop in netbeans say.
> > >>>
> > >>> Just my 2c worth.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Stephen
> > >>> On Thu, 2022-06-23 at 14:59 +0200, Łukasz Dywicki wrote:
> > >>>> I been wrapping head around this as I had a necessity to watch
> CANopen
> > >>>> traffic decoded by plc4x. I ended up building fairly basic web page
> > >>>> which displayed most recent frames (so I could stay with local
> > >>>> socketcan transport), yet it was far from useful or portable.
> Recently
> > >>>> I also did struggle a lot with bloody modbus. My usecases are often
> > >>>> focused on making the commissioning to generate further software
> > >>>> configuration.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> My little research in topic of desktop applications ended up at
> javafx
> > >>>> which allows to make it small and compile to native binary thanks to
> > >>>> graal. My experiences with RCP platforms are rather bad (I did some
> > >>>> small Eclipse RCP projects), even if I have no issues with OSGi.
> > >>>> Problem
> > >>>> I see in RCP platforms is sparse development documentation, I also
> > >>>> perceive both Eclipse RCP and Netbeans as focused mainly on
> organizing
> > >>>> navigation while strongly depending on UI frameworks (jface/swt or
> > >>>> swing/awt). Effectively you still need to build tables and so on,
> but
> > >>>> with much more overhead.
> > >>>> Please do not take above too seriously in context of Netbeans, I
> don't
> > >>>> know much about it and its flexibility. I don't know how to build it
> > >>>> with Maven, hence it feels strange.
> > >>>> For the Kotlin stuff and frameworks there - I can say that any UI
> > >>>> project which Google is pushing is a red flag to me. Looking at GWT,
> > >>>> Angular 1.x (I used both) I simply fear that they can step back from
> > >>>> "experiment" after a year or two leaving everything to the
> community.
> > >>>> I
> > >>>> looked at kootlin and javafx a while ago and there is not much
> > >>>> happening there. I don't know if is because of maturity, javafx
> issues
> > >>>> or shift to other UI approaches.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> As I had no time to work on it I just postponed that to a future.
> > >>>> Yet, I
> > >>>> still dream from time to time about proper "fieldbus.app". ;-)
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>> Łukasz
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 23.06.2022 14:46, Michal Harakal wrote:
> > >>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I would be also interested in, having a strong opinion on
> technology
> > >>>>> stack, but fully open to design and function.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> My suggestion is writing a Desktop App with Kotlin Jetpack Compose
> > >>>>> for Desktop:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Props:
> > >>>>> * modern, state of the art, way to write reactive UI (natural way
> to
> > >>>>> implement unidirectional data flows architectures)
> > >>>>> * JVM target
> > >>>>> * open source, backed by Google And Jetbrains (they use it in their
> > >>>>> critical products)
> > >>>>> * Kotlin provides 1A class interoperability support with Java and
> > >>>>> JVM
> > >>>>> * since Jetpack Compose is originally created and used by Android,
> > >>>>> you can have an Android App out of the box, with little effort
> > >>>>> * integration with Jetbrains Intellij
> > >>>>> * even if you don't know Jetpack Compose Framewrok, you can
> > >>>>> contribute too with your Java/Kotlin skills imedialtely on
> > >>>>> domain/bussines etc. parts of code ..
> > >>>>> * easy to learn
> > >>>>> * with multiplatform support are native apps with their native UI
> > >>>>> frameworks (e.g. iOS)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Cons:
> > >>>>> * Still in Alpha
> > >>>>> * backed by Google and Jetbrains
> > >>>>> * Kotlin is probably not the number one programming language here
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Best regards,
> > >>>>> Michal
> > >>>>>> Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> hat am 23.06.2022
> > >>>>>> 10:55 geschrieben:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi all,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Again, I was in need of a simple application to simply monitor the
> > >>>>>> values on a Modbus device (I’m currently configuring my Wago
> > >>>>>> PFC200 Modbus Slave interface).
> > >>>>>> I could use stuff like the “Modbus Poll” GUI tool, but my trial
> > >>>>>> expired and I’m not willing to pay 130€ for this limited
> > >>>>>> functionality.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So, I thought, it would be an awesome addition to PLC4X if we had
> > >>>>>> some sort of GUI application, that uses the Discover functionality
> > >>>>>> to find possible PLCs and list them in a tree view.
> > >>>>>> If the use double clicks on one of these connections, it connects
> > >>>>>> and possibly executes the Browse functionality and lists up what
> > >>>>>> it finds.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I know that I could simply start working on something like that,
> > >>>>>> but I thought this would also be a great thing for someone else to
> > >>>>>> implement as it doesn’t require too deep knowledge of PLC4X
> > >>>>>> internals.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> And I suck at building beautiful UIs :-)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Anyone interested?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Chris
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>


--
B*e * the *Ch*ange

Reply via email to