Feel free to add them as labels on our Github :-)

Am Fr., 4. Nov. 2022 um 10:56 Uhr schrieb jl hong <[email protected]>:

> Hello Lukas,
>
>    - Driver-Profinet
>    - Driver-ADS
>    - API
>    - Driver-S7
>    - Core
>    - Util-Pool
>    - newbie
>    - Code-Generation
>    - Driver-Modbus
>    - Integration-NiFi
>    - feature-request
>    - Driver-OPC-UA
>    - documentation
>    - Scraper
>    - Driver-Fatek
>    - Testing
>    - Integration-Camel
>    - Driver-Ethernet/IP
>    - beginner
>    - feature
>    - low-hanging-fruit
>    - easy-fix
>    - PLC4C
>    - documentation-update
>    - docker
>    - Integration-Kafka-Connect
>    - examples
>    - Build
>    - Driver-CANopen
>    - PLC4J
>
> The list which I got by jira-to-issues is current labels in our Jira.
> Some of them are not on your list, such as "driver".
>
> Lukas Ott <[email protected]> 於 2022年11月1日 週二 凌晨3:25寫道:
>
> > I started cleaning up the Issues on JIRA.
> > Current status is 84 Issues.
> >
> > On Github I added a few labels.
> > Current list of labels (17):
> >
> >    - test
> >    - task
> >    - wish
> >    - new feature
> >    - bug
> >    - dependencies
> >    - duplicate
> >    - enhancement
> >    - go
> >    - good first issue
> >    - help wanted
> >    - invalid
> >    - java
> >    - python
> >    - question
> >    - wontfix
> >    - github_actions
> >
> > Open tasks:
> > - Turn off new Jiras
> > This can be done by turning off the create issue permission for all
> > non-admins and adding an announcement in Portal Settings redirecting
> people
> > to GitHub.
> > - Migrating Existing Issues
> > - Create / Add Issue Template
> >
> > Am Mo., 31. Okt. 2022 um 19:26 Uhr schrieb Ben Hutcheson <
> > [email protected]>:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > This will make the issues more visible, which is probably a good thing.
> > >
> > > On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 12:06 pm, Lukas Ott <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thank you Dominik! This
> > > >
> > > > It seems we have less of the Cons they are mentioning :-)
> > > > -> Google Summer of Code was not yet part of PLC4X
> > > > -> We only need to migrate around 100 Jira issues
> > > > -> I am not aware of any Milestones in our project that we track in
> > Jira.
> > > >
> > > > Concerning preparation:
> > > > - We already have list of labels
> > > > List to be added:
> > > >
> > > > Category
> > > >
> > > > Values
> > > >
> > > > Priority
> > > >
> > > > "P0", "P1", "P2", "P3"
> > > >
> > > > Type
> > > >
> > > > "Bug", "Improvement", "New Feature", "Task", "Test", "Wish", "Outage"
> > > >
> > > > Component
> > > >
> > > > One label per JIRA component, formatted "Component: <JIRA component>"
> > > (e.g.
> > > > "Component: sdk-go")
> > > >
> > > > Status
> > > >
> > > > "Awaiting Triage", "Fixed", "Not a problem", "Duplicate"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - Yes we should add a issue template
> > > > This can be done by turning off the create issue permission for all
> > > > non-admins and adding an announcement in Portal Settings redirecting
> > > people
> > > > to GitHub.
> > > > - Update documentation after migration
> > > >
> > > > Next steps
> > > > - Turn on Github Issues Tab
> > > > - Turn off Jira Tickets (How do we do that?)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Am Mo., 31. Okt. 2022 um 18:48 Uhr schrieb Dominik Riemer <
> > [email protected]
> > > >:
> > > >
> > > > > I've recently looked at other ASF projects which discussed
> migration
> > > from
> > > > > Jira to Github, e.g., here are some discussions from Apache Beam:
> > > > >
> > > > > Feature Comparison:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_n7gboVbSKPs-CVcHzADgg8qpNL9igiHqUPCmiOslf0/edit#heading=h.r8qwrrbs8odn
> > > > > Migration Plan:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1powrXGbjMLMYl9ibRzMda5o5HM_p44XvBy5MZu75Q5E/edit#heading=h.wskna8eurvjv
> > > > >
> > > > > And Beam also open-sourced the migration tool they used:
> > > > > https://github.com/google/jira-to-issues
> > > > >
> > > > > I've not yet tried it, but looks quite good 😉
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Dominik
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Lukas Ott <[email protected]>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, October 31, 2022 6:41 PM
> > > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?
> > > > >
> > > > > I will look into that.
> > > > >
> > > > > Currently we have 103 open jira issues. Oldest one is more than 2
> > years
> > > > > ago.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Mo., 31. Okt. 2022 um 18:28 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz <
> > > > > [email protected]>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I’m also fine with that.
> > > > > > So anyone willing to work on the migration?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Chris
> > > > > >
> > > > > > From: Lukas Ott <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Date: Monday, 31. October 2022 at 17:50
> > > > > > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub issues?
> > > > > > Hi Chris,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In my humble opinion we should not run parallel.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Our Jira has already a lot of issues that are outdated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So i opt for enabling GitHub Issues and migrating the few Jira
> > Issues
> > > > > > that are still worked on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This helps us also for cleaning up and having one public issue
> > > > > > tracker, where everyone can easily see what is worked on and what
> > is
> > > > > open.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Luk
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Mo., 31. Okt. 2022 um 17:07 Uhr schrieb Christofer Dutz <
> > > > > > [email protected]>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > for those of you that haven’t heard of it, Apache will be
> > disabling
> > > > > > signup
> > > > > > > to Apache’s Jira due to excessive Spam problems.
> > > > > > > So, for people outside of the project, wanting to submit
> issues,
> > > > > > > there will be no simple way to do so.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How about we turn on GitHub Issues and simply run both in
> > parallel.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Chris
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to